Buick When starting new posts, please specify YEAR, MAKE, MODEL, ENGINE type, and whatever modifications you have made.

h-body suspensions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 30, 2003 | 08:51 AM
  #31  
DeathRat's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, AB Canada
DeathRat is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by Steve LS
What was the SE that it came with F41 ?
My 92 Bonneville SE (Fully Loaded - Except Sunroof) has F41!
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2003 | 10:46 AM
  #32  
Jim W's Avatar
Senior Member
Expert Gearhead
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 20,893
Likes: 2
From: Mississauga, Ontario
Jim W is on a distinguished road
Default

I'm in the same boat as you 'Rat...fully loaded F41, I like the firmer ride, I have been in Buicks and Olds with FE1 and FE3. Its nice, but F41 gives you more road feel.
Reply
Old May 1, 2003 | 01:17 AM
  #33  
DeathRat's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, AB Canada
DeathRat is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by jr's3800
Hey Rat, How about some P/N'* for the F41 springs, front and rear
Well your wish is my command!
Just gimme a little time to copy out all the charts then! LOL
Reply
Old May 1, 2003 | 02:57 AM
  #34  
speedyguy's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 0
From: Cali
speedyguy is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by Steve LS
Ty I thought you were using the Moog'* for your lowering springs ? I'm still dreaming of a set one day. It would still be so nice to get some solid PSI rates as in stock and your aftermarket ones. If I go lower on the 86 I want it to be stiff, then I'll probably it Unless I'm going like hell then it will smooth out.
I was but unknown to many I have spent countless money and time destroying springs with the help of spring companies. The moog product is not a close enough tolerance. In most cases they work...but I can’t have a full order of springs be off on one corner. I have a company who has all the stats now and I can get these springs for you no problem. I also have a full line of caddy springs and I am now working out an Aurora spring set. The final deal is a 2000-2003 Bonneville kit that will use just the front springs and have instructions for lowering the rear. This will reduce costs maintain stock performance and give the look for a better price.

Ty
Reply
Old May 1, 2003 | 02:08 PM
  #35  
2000SilverBullet's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
2000SilverBullet is on a distinguished road
Default

The final deal is a 2000-2003 Bonneville kit that will use just the front springs and have instructions for lowering the rear. This will reduce costs maintain stock performance and give the look for a better price.
Way to go Ty

Keep us all updated on your progress.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2003 | 02:31 AM
  #36  
speedyguy's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 0
From: Cali
speedyguy is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by Steve LS
Ty I thought you were using the Moog'* for your lowering springs ? I'm still dreaming of a set one day. It would still be so nice to get some solid PSI rates as in stock and your aftermarket ones. If I go lower on the 86 I want it to be stiff, then I'll probably it Unless I'm going like hell then it will smooth out.
No Moog. We started with the moog specks but they were too far off.

Ty
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
QuickLTD
1992-1999
1
Apr 6, 2009 09:37 AM
marquette97
General GM Chat
10
May 30, 2006 10:48 PM
itdc1
General GM Chat
7
Sep 2, 2004 10:07 AM
DeeGee96SE
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
5
Jun 29, 2004 12:21 AM
karfreek
1992-1999
1
Mar 10, 2003 11:02 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:58 AM.