|
Originally Posted by jwikoff99
Can anyone expalin why a 300C would be faster than a GTO? I don't get it.
|
Originally Posted by inurok
footballplayer7474, You are lucky not to have to deal with crappy snow but then again you had some bad hurricanes some time back.
150-200 MPH Winds or Snow over the top of my head?????? I would go hurricanes because they last 2-3 days and maybe 4-5 if they stall, and have a small chance of hitting you every time compared to a front carrying snow. just my 2 cents... jwikoff99 wrote: Can anyone expalin why a 300C would be faster than a GTO? I don't get it. 1993 sle wrote :stupid: |
Did I miss something? Inurok said the 300 was faster than the GTO. I've never seen or heard that claim before.
|
hmmm, the 300C goes 0-60 in 6.3 sec according to chrysler, GTO does it in 4.7 sec according to pontiac. sounds pretty close...not. I think he got em mixed up accidentally.
|
Okay is possible I drove the GTO 5.7 not the 6.0 but its 5.7 to 5.7. but then again you can get a 300C with a 6.1 now and yes that will kill a GTO 6.0
|
Originally Posted by inurok
Okay is possible I drove the GTO 5.7 not the 6.0 but its 5.7 to 5.7. but then again you can get a 300C with a 6.1 now and yes that will kill a GTO 6.0
|
Originally Posted by 1993 SLE
Originally Posted by inurok
Okay is possible I drove the GTO 5.7 not the 6.0 but its 5.7 to 5.7. but then again you can get a 300C with a 6.1 now and yes that will kill a GTO 6.0
|
Well all I know is my 2005 GXP is faster than your cars...no mods..END
|
Ok...
I have seen no evidence that any stock 300C can be faster than any stock GTO of the same year. The quickness of your GXP is not in question here. |
Mercedes Transmissions are far from bad. That's what's in the 300c.
The 5.7 GTO had 350 HP, the 300C had 5-10 less. The 6.1L Hemi also will cost atleast $45k. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:40 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands