Audio (and aftermarket electronics) This is your place for alarms, remote starters, to brag about your system, exaggerate your db levels, or simply ask questions for stock or aftermarket audio. No Flames! (except from roasted amps)

GXP Audio (install pics added) updated pics pg2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 02:37 PM
  #11  
toastedoats's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,837
Likes: 3
From: Fitchburg Ma _ToastedRice_
toastedoats is on a distinguished road
Default

in order to have surround sound you would need to get a surround sound headunit.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 02:42 PM
  #12  
ReallyAGXP's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,277
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere south of Ottawa with your girlfriend driving faster then you.
ReallyAGXP is on a distinguished road
Default

well maybe i used the wrong terminology but I think you know what i mean Oatsy
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 02:50 PM
  #13  
toastedoats's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,837
Likes: 3
From: Fitchburg Ma _ToastedRice_
toastedoats is on a distinguished road
Default

well, surround sound is a very specific thing....


however, if you dont mean surround sound like you have in your home theater, then yes, i do know what you mean.

I honestly prefer my stereo without any rear speakers. I have tried several combinations of having speakers in, out, amplified, driven off the headunit, etc... and the config i like the best is to remove the rear speakers.
However, i do have subs that make up my lows, and without subs, 6x9s are a must to produce some of the lower frequencies
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 03:22 PM
  #14  
mike1053's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: republic, mo
mike1053 is on a distinguished road
Default

My taste has changed some over the years, I have alowasy had rear fill, now I have to have, when kids in car subs off, use a switch to tunr of the remote wire to sub amp, and then some times yo ujust want to relax, no bass, so to me rears are a needed evil.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 03:25 PM
  #15  
BLACK94SSEi's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,596
Likes: 0
From: Melrose
BLACK94SSEi is on a distinguished road
Default

Nice setup you got there. I love the rear fill but after gaining the confidence of making my own Gauge pod, im planning on bringing the front stage up and making custom tweeter pillar pods
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 05:30 PM
  #16  
ohenry5's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, MO
ohenry5 is on a distinguished road
Default

I would do the rear, it will give you a fuller sound. And I dont know what people are talking about, you can still hear behind you and having sound come from back there sounds better then not having any. Just my opinion I guess
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 05:36 PM
  #17  
toastedoats's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,837
Likes: 3
From: Fitchburg Ma _ToastedRice_
toastedoats is on a distinguished road
Default

when i first started playing with stereos i liked having lots of sound behind me, but the more i played and the more i learned, the more i realized that to my ears the presence of rear speakers USUALLY has a negative impact on SQ and imaging
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 06:22 PM
  #18  
corvettecrazy's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,182
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY (college)
corvettecrazy is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by ReallyAGXP
...just trying not to give up my trunk space. Like i said when I get the time I might build a sub enclosure that allows me to atleast fit a hockey bag in there with out a fight.
If you picked a sub that required a smaller sealed box...ie. instead of 1.3 cu ft chose a sub that requires a .3-.5 cubic foot box trunk space wont be an issue.

I would be able to fit a hockey bag in any of my audio set ups.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 06:38 PM
  #19  
ReallyAGXP's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,277
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere south of Ottawa with your girlfriend driving faster then you.
ReallyAGXP is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by corvettecrazy
Originally Posted by ReallyAGXP
...just trying not to give up my trunk space. Like i said when I get the time I might build a sub enclosure that allows me to atleast fit a hockey bag in there with out a fight.
If you picked a sub that required a smaller sealed box...ie. instead of 1.3 cu ft chose a sub that requires a .3-.5 cubic foot box trunk space wont be an issue.

I would be able to fit a hockey bag in any of my audio set ups.
Rob,
Show me a 12" sub that fits in a box that size even a Kicker Solobaric 12 requires a 1cubic foot box..

anyways im interested.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 07:24 PM
  #20  
corvettecrazy's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,182
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY (college)
corvettecrazy is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by ReallyAGXP
Originally Posted by corvettecrazy
Originally Posted by ReallyAGXP
...just trying not to give up my trunk space. Like i said when I get the time I might build a sub enclosure that allows me to atleast fit a hockey bag in there with out a fight.
If you picked a sub that required a smaller sealed box...ie. instead of 1.3 cu ft chose a sub that requires a .3-.5 cubic foot box trunk space wont be an issue.

I would be able to fit a hockey bag in any of my audio set ups.
Rob,
Show me a 12" sub that fits in a box that size even a Kicker Solobaric 12 requires a 1cubic foot box..

anyways im interested.
http://www.tcsounds.com/tc9.htm

= .8ft^3

maybe if you want a small box you should consider a 10" sub
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:11 AM.