2000-2005 Discuss your 2000-2005 Bonneville SE, SLE, and SSEi Please use General Chat for non-mechanical issues, and Performance and Brainstorming for improvements.

cam vs rocker, springs, pushrods combo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 11, 2005 | 01:05 AM
  #11  
bonnevillemac's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a Northstar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
From: The Bluegrass State
bonnevillemac is on a distinguished road
Default

Hey Shawn thanks for your input. The cam is more work and it would probably be better. One concern of mine is all the supporting mods I would have to do, timing chain, pushrods, etc... The main reason I was looking at rocker, etc.. is cost effectiveness. My wife and I are about to have our first baby so I need to do what I'm gonna do know what I mean?? Even in that light would the cam still be cheaper??

Thank again,

Tim
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2005 | 02:58 PM
  #12  
dbtk2's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,022
Likes: 1
From: Holt, MI & Lima, OH
dbtk2 is on a distinguished road
Default

The cam isn't cheaper, its just not THAT MUCH more. With rockers you basically need to get stronger springs. So on top of that all you would need is a timing chain, tensioner, and sprockets, then the labor. There is nothing wrong with the stock pushrods and I would leave them stock unless you are looking to get really serious with the engine. A cam is the same price as the non-roller 1.9'*, and cheaper than roller 1.9'*, so the only difference is the timing chain/tensioner/gears, and gaskets. So you're basically looking at twice the power gain for $100-$200 more. Its all up to you to decide, but I think I would get the cam if I were you. If it were a boosted car then I would definately recommend rockers instead, however I just don't feel that you would be satisfied with the gain.

Shawn
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2005 | 09:51 AM
  #13  
bonnevillemac's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a Northstar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
From: The Bluegrass State
bonnevillemac is on a distinguished road
Default

Hey Shawn, Yeah I'm thinking of going with the cam. So I would pretty much need a new timing chain, tensioner, and gaskets right?? Maybe a really killer Christmas gift huh...Better start sucking up to the little woman. haha. Now I'm gonna ask the universal question... how much power gain am I looking to gain with the cam??

Thanks for all your help,

Tim
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2005 | 11:04 AM
  #14  
Rogue's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,127
Likes: 1
From: Westerville, Ohio 2000 Black SSEi
Rogue is on a distinguished road
Default

With an aftermarket cam in an N/A you may want to think about a higher stall converter. Aftermarket cams will typically make their power in the upper rpms and so lower rpms may suffer from a "loss" of horsepower. A higher stall converter will get you into the upper rpm faster as well as keep you there on the shifts.

SC vehicles don't suffer from this because we have so much low end torque.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2005 | 02:09 PM
  #15  
dbtk2's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,022
Likes: 1
From: Holt, MI & Lima, OH
dbtk2 is on a distinguished road
Default

You would probably gain ~20-25hp with the cam depending on your other mods. As Rogue said, a high stall convertor is going to help due to the low-end torque loss you will have, however if your worried about cost for now I'd stray away from it just because it would be pretty costly, but for the future its definately something to think about.

Shawn
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Danthurs
Performance
0
Jan 13, 2009 03:20 PM
Danthurs
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
35
Apr 25, 2008 04:36 AM
Allmachtige
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
8
Oct 14, 2007 04:02 PM
harofreak00
Lounge
6
May 25, 2005 07:49 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:21 AM.