What year is the Lightest SSEi 92-95

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Oct 9, 2002 | 09:35 PM

Bonneville_blue

Thread Starter

Senior Member

Posts like a Turbo

Joined: Aug 2002

Posts: 247

Likes: 0

From: Toledo, Ohio

Bonneville_blue is on a distinguished road

What year is the Lightest SSEi 92-95

Whats the Lightest SSEi 92-95

Oct 9, 2002 | 09:51 PM

csprague

Senior Member

Posts like a Turbo

Joined: Jan 2002

Posts: 267

Likes: 0

From: Torrington, CT

I'd venture a guess that they're all about the same. There'* nothing big I can think of that'd make a difference between the years.

Oct 9, 2002 | 11:12 PM

SSEi95

Junior Member

Joined: May 2002

Posts: 1

Likes: 0

I had heard once (don't remeber where) that the '95 was the lightest year, but not by much. This has nothing to do wih the fact that I have one but it'* just what I've heard.

Oct 9, 2002 | 11:20 PM

DeathRat

Senior Member

True Car Nut

Joined: May 2002

Posts: 2,621

Likes: 0

From: Edmonton, AB Canada

Quote:

Originally Posted by jr's3800

I think they are all pretty much the same... The SSEi models should be the heaviest of the bunch..... The 92-95 SSEi'* will problably way a few pounds more than the 96-99'* due to the changes to the 3800... The 3800 series II engines lost a little weight over its older brother... But its still not much at all........

The engine did lose some weight But the Trans gained some weight!

Oct 10, 2002 | 01:24 AM

willwren

Junior Member

Posts like a Ricer Type-R

Joined: Aug 2002

Posts: 11

Likes: 13

I've heard the 95 was the lightest.....but that'* NA...which means seriesII, so the SSEi wouldn't be that light if the motor series was the factor. Even so, it can't be by much.

Oct 10, 2002 | 01:47 AM

willwren

Junior Member

Posts like a Ricer Type-R

Joined: Aug 2002

Posts: 11

Likes: 13

One of these days I'll have to ask my agent how low my rates would be for NA. I know at JSeabert'* age, his rates would have almost doubled for the SC.