what tranny do i have?
#21
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So what you're saying, Deathrat, is that no Bonnies from 92 - 95 used the HD version, supercharged or not?
The HD transaxle was used in an entirely different car (in this case a caddy) and never in a Bonnie. (?) And the pan on my trans that reads 4T60E should not have 'HD' on it (I was under the impression that the previous owner of my bonnie swapped the HD for a standard - but from what I'm reading here that wouldn't be the case.)
The HD transaxle was used in an entirely different car (in this case a caddy) and never in a Bonnie. (?) And the pan on my trans that reads 4T60E should not have 'HD' on it (I was under the impression that the previous owner of my bonnie swapped the HD for a standard - but from what I'm reading here that wouldn't be the case.)
#23
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Edmonton, AB Canada
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SSEi95
I beleive the "i"'* got the 4T60-e HD tranny. Same as the SE but beefed up a little to handle the extra power.
The 92 SSEi'* (or any other Series I for that matter) never got the HD. There was no HD version of the 4T60-E that went into a Bonneville! There was a HD version of the 4T65-E though for the Series II'*. It could be possible to "custom" build a HD version of the 4T60-E though as Ty has done with his "Bullet Proof" Transaxles, but outside of that, a Transaxle swap would have to be done from another car line. The only "STOCK" differences between the SE, SSE & SSEi'* were the Final Drive Ratios. Hope this helps.
#25
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
Please try to start a new post instead of digging one up from the 'archives'
Yes, it is. Direct bolt. You may have trouble matching gear ratios, though. The HD is 2.97.
Yes, it is. Direct bolt. You may have trouble matching gear ratios, though. The HD is 2.97.
#26
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hi
then its a matter of a pcm flash. it seems that since these pcm'* are rather primative computers with the processing power of a 486 pc, one could write code for them once he has the source code.
i'll look into this.
"archives" lol.....this thread was last posted to only a little over a month ago.
then its a matter of a pcm flash. it seems that since these pcm'* are rather primative computers with the processing power of a 486 pc, one could write code for them once he has the source code.
i'll look into this.
"archives" lol.....this thread was last posted to only a little over a month ago.
#27
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
Originally Posted by lght1
"archives" lol.....this thread was last posted to only a little over a month ago.
The point is that people have to read through 2 pages of an old post to get to your new question.
#28
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hi
ok, i understand, not a problem.
i post frequently at pc tech sites where threads can be hundreds of posts long and can span 2 or more years one thread i can recall spanned several generations of chipsets and cpu technology.
ok, i understand, not a problem.
i post frequently at pc tech sites where threads can be hundreds of posts long and can span 2 or more years one thread i can recall spanned several generations of chipsets and cpu technology.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
killer_cr80r
Lounge
4
04-20-2004 12:00 PM
bonnie94ssei
General GM Chat
7
11-03-2003 01:44 AM