1992-1999 Series I L27 (1992-1994 SE,SLE, SSE) & Series II L36 (1995-1999 SE, SSE, SLE) and common problems for the Series I and II L67 (all supercharged models 92-99) Including Olds 88's, Olds LSS's and Buick Lesabres Please use General Chat for non-mechanical issues, and Performance and Brainstorming for improvements.

how many miles before fuel pump craps out ??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 08:31 PM
  #11  
vital49's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1
Likes: 5
From: Purgatory
vital49 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: pump

Originally Posted by SSEBONNE4EVA
did you guys install OEM pumps?
Yes. I wouldn't use anything other than OEM for something as critical as a fuel pump. Plus, it'* not the most easy job to do on the H-bodies (< 99, anyway).
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2005 | 12:10 AM
  #12  
willwren's Avatar
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 11
Likes: 13
willwren is on a distinguished road
Default

I'd say OEM (AC Delco) or Walbro only. Walbro has a reputation for performance, quality, and reliability.



IN A NUTSHELL:


"When will my fuel pump crap out?" can be best answered by:

"When your fuel pressure doesn't meet spec".
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2005 | 10:14 AM
  #14  
vital49's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1
Likes: 5
From: Purgatory
vital49 is on a distinguished road
Default

Don and Bill...I followed the same logic without consulting anyone!

That'* exactly what I thought when I replaced my pump...pressure was low, sluggish acceleration, and took longer to start.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2005 | 10:17 AM
  #15  
willwren's Avatar
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 11
Likes: 13
willwren is on a distinguished road
Default

Funny thing on my 93, If I started it within a second or two of ignition on, it was fine, but 4 seconds after ignition on or later, it wouldn't be happy. It came up ok, but bled down too fast.

The 95 doesn't have that problem, it'* just a slow-starter each time, regardless of delay. It'* fuel pressure isn't quite as bad as the 93 was, but it'* close.

Maybe I can limp it until July and get some help dropping the tank at WCBF06.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2005 | 10:22 AM
  #16  
vital49's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1
Likes: 5
From: Purgatory
vital49 is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by willwren
Maybe I can limp it until July and get some help dropping the tank at WCBF06.
Or if you have to in the mean time, use my trick....use a transmission jack as the extra set of hands. Transmission jack for dropping the tank is a life saver!
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2005 | 10:26 AM
  #17  
BillBoost37's Avatar
DINOSAURUS BOOSTUS

Expert Gearhead
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 41,391
Likes: 30
From: Enfield, CT
BillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Vital.. do you think the tranny jack is much better than a standard jack w/wood to protect the tank?
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2005 | 10:44 AM
  #19  
BillBoost37's Avatar
DINOSAURUS BOOSTUS

Expert Gearhead
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 41,391
Likes: 30
From: Enfield, CT
BillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Mortehl'* pump was so bad that it would start to lose ground at anything over 1,500rpms. My fuel pressure gauge has a 7 foot hose, allowing FP to be monitored under actual driving conditions.

Sitting still and whacking the throttle is one ithing..but actual driving really shows any issues.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2005 | 10:56 AM
  #20  
vital49's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1
Likes: 5
From: Purgatory
vital49 is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by BillBoost37
Vital.. do you think the tranny jack is much better than a standard jack w/wood to protect the tank?
Definitely. With the method you suggested you'd have to balance the tank on top of the plywood, which is on top of the jack "donut". Makes it awkward. Plus you don't get the full range of movement. Basically with the standard jack you can only roll it forward and backward with ease. Left to right is a pain.

Transmission jack...you can take advantage of the 12"x12" (or bigger) flat plane. No need for plywood. Get full circular movements on the casters. You get 100% pivot out of the plane. And, it'* more sensitve to slight increases and decreases in height and plane adjustment. I also liked it because the pivot adjustment allowed for me to accomodate the car being on jack stands on an angle. My jack (or second hand) could accomodate it nicely!
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:24 AM.