Can I put gas at Octane 87(regular) in my 97 SSEi? - GM Forum - Buick, Cadillac, Chev, Olds, GMC & Pontiac chat


1992-1999 Series I L27 (1992-1994 SE,SLE, SSE) & Series II L36 (1995-1999 SE, SSE, SLE) and common problems for the Series I and II L67 (all supercharged models 92-99) Including Olds 88's, Olds LSS's and Buick Lesabres Please use General Chat for non-mechanical issues, and Performance and Brainstorming for improvements.

Reply
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-03-2005, 12:21 PM   #1
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 31
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
tverhein is on a distinguished road
Default Can I put gas at Octane 87(regular) in my 97 SSEi?

I have a 1997 SSEi with 67k miles on it. Can I put regular unleaded (Octane 87) in the tank even though it calls for premium unleaded (Octaine 93)? With gas prices the way they are, I put regular unleaded(Octane87) in the tank. I have been doing this for a few months and I don't hear any pinging or any noise from the engine. Will I cause engine problems long-term using regular unleaded instead of premium unleaded?
tverhein is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2005, 12:44 PM   #2
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
willwren is on a distinguished road
Default

You can cause long-term damage to the engine, and you're actually getting worse fuel mileage as the PCM is pulling timing due to the lower octane (more knock) fuel.

99% of the SSEi owners here wouldn't dare do that. Myself among them. 92 minimum in both my cars.
willwren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2005, 12:53 PM   #3
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Posts: 1,441
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
VigCS is on a distinguished road
Default

What about 87 in an SE? =)
VigCS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2005, 01:09 PM   #4
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 19,756
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
1993 SLE is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VigCS
What about 87 in an SE? =)
that is recommended
1993 SLE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2005, 03:31 PM   #5
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,095
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
DrJay is on a distinguished road
Default

Will you always have a way to scare people
DrJay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2005, 03:40 PM   #6
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
willwren is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrJay
Will you always have a way to scare people
If his knock sensor fails, he CAN damage the engine. You are about the only dissenter on this issue. The argument rages, but at the same time, why take the chance?
willwren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2005, 06:21 PM   #7
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,993
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
JimmyFloyd is on a distinguished road
Default

I am running mid grade 89 in my 93 SSEi, but that is the lowest I will go. About once a month I run premium in it just so it remembers what it is like.
JimmyFloyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2005, 06:52 PM   #8
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
rjolly87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 6,857
Thanked 298 Times in 246 Posts
rjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant futurerjolly87 has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JimmyFloyd
I am running mid grade 89 in my 93 SSEi, but that is the lowest I will go. About once a month I run premium in it just so it remembers what it is like.
does your fuel mileage suffer?
rjolly87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2005, 07:49 PM   #9
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sauk Centre, MN
Posts: 5,458
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
OLBlueEyesBonne is on a distinguished road
Default

The way gas prices are now, at $.10-.15 more per gallon to upgrade to premium over regular why not just buy the premium? I know it'* still insanely high (I'm as PI$$ED off as anyone) price for fuel, but if you consider that that is still the same price diff as it was 5 yrs ago when regular was $1.05/gal and premium was $1.17 (at least that'* what it was here) it'* worth the price difference now, almost more than ever.
I myself will not go below 91 octane in any vehicle I drive, unless I know it runs better with lower octane.
I say go for the gold and don't settle for bronze either.
OLBlueEyesBonne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2005, 10:32 PM   #10
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,095
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
DrJay is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by willwren
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrJay
Will you always have a way to scare people
If his knock sensor fails, he CAN damage the engine. You are about the only dissenter on this issue. The argument rages, but at the same time, why take the chance?
Dissent? Not really. With that statement right there I totally agree, especially with the emphasis you provided. To me there'* a big difference between just saying "you can damage your engine" and stating that if one engine component fails you could damage another. The engine is built in such a way that 87 octane will NOT damage it. If engine components are failing, however, you do run a risk. But that'* the same with anything. If my MAF is failing I run a risk just driving it, same with the o2 sensor, egr, or any number of other parts. With that I wouldn't simply state "if you drive your car you can damage it" on an assumption of failing sensors...make sense?

One statement causes unnecessary fear while the other actually informs him of the risks involved.

Interesting to me there isn't the same fear of using a K&N filter, which many feel has a more direct effect on a sensor which could in turn cause engine failure.

I'm not trying to split hairs, but that'* the only reason I say anything on the subject anymore. I'll be quiet now
DrJay is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Octane Points (Octane Boost) bandit General GM Chat 2 08-28-2007 11:21 PM
Do not put 85 octane in your SSEi. (KR comparisions) Hans General GM Chat 3 02-22-2007 11:09 AM
regular gas in ssei bonnycrazy 1992-1999 13 10-06-2005 02:24 PM
Do You Have to Use High Octane Gas in SSEi??? denny3292 1992-1999 6 09-13-2003 01:45 PM
SSEi Octane in gas?? BonneAlien General GM Chat 10 04-13-2003 04:42 PM


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:12 PM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.