92 sc block shot ...can I use nsc block????
#11
Originally Posted by 92 SSE! mo Charger
Im sure the sc has flat top pistons and beefed up rods. hopefullly with a 30 over bore done to the non sc block and using new sc pistons and rods will add a few more horses. i will search for a scat crank "just incase" is it easier to pull motor up or drop the sub frams out bottom?
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
First... The crank and block are the same between the 92 NA and SC Motors... The heads are also the same..
The Rods and pistons are different..
You do not want to use Flat top pistons unless you plan on running lower boost via a larger pulley.. These engines Have 8.5 : 1 Compression and that means dished pistons... When you throw in the boost you can be as high as 11 : 1 Compression with the SC...
Do not get too carried away with the over bore.... Only go as far as you really have to...
On the crank, if it has to be turned down .020, consider it garbage
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
The Rods and pistons are different..
You do not want to use Flat top pistons unless you plan on running lower boost via a larger pulley.. These engines Have 8.5 : 1 Compression and that means dished pistons... When you throw in the boost you can be as high as 11 : 1 Compression with the SC...
Do not get too carried away with the over bore.... Only go as far as you really have to...
On the crank, if it has to be turned down .020, consider it garbage
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
#13
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: BonnevilleHell
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jr's3800
The heads are also the same..
The rest is true. The block and crank will interchange. The rods, pistons, and balancer should be changed to the */C specific parts....or run the N/A parts on a lower boost level (to compensate for the higher base compression of the N/A motor.)
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by clm2112
Originally Posted by jr's3800
The heads are also the same..
The rest is true. The block and crank will interchange. The rods, pistons, and balancer should be changed to the */C specific parts....or run the N/A parts on a lower boost level (to compensate for the higher base compression of the N/A motor.)
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
#16
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: BonnevilleHell
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jr's3800
For the 92 L27 and L67 they used the same PCV system unlike the 90-91 LN3 that had the heads without the Passages
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by clm2112
Originally Posted by jr's3800
For the 92 L27 and L67 they used the same PCV system unlike the 90-91 LN3 that had the heads without the Passages
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
#18
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: BonnevilleHell
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jr's3800
Took me a long while to figure out the differences between the LN3 and L27.. Its amazing how that little change could get rid of PCV hoses and the like..
(Back when I was contemplating doing the top end swap on the LN3 using a M62 SC, I kept finding two part numbers for the heads...one specific to the the SC, one for the NA..so I figured they came from the factory that way...NA'* without the PCV, SC with the PCV. Had I realized the NA L27 came with the holes in the heads too, I would have yanked a pair in the local yards instead of working around the PCV system.) I think I'm going to take a few tylenols and go climb back under the car.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GunsOfNavarone
GMC/Chevrolet Truck/SUV
11
12-19-2014 09:11 PM
SPEED ADICTIONS
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
3
05-05-2008 09:52 PM
Damemorder
Audio (and aftermarket electronics)
3
01-29-2004 08:06 AM