07 Cadillac STS-V
03-21-2007, 04:32 PM
#23
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Davison,Michigan
Posts: 1,867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by its840
hey how ya get pics of my car??? its just suposta go get that one thingies fixed... lol thats a freaking great ride!!! i wanta drive!!!!! any interior pic??
Mar21_0002.jpg
Mar21_0003.jpg
Also I was cruising this one around a bit today also... not a bad ride..
Mar21_0005.jpg
Mar21_0004.jpg
03-21-2007, 06:32 PM
#24
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That is a STS-V with 469hp. It does perform weaker than I would expect though. The E55 AMG also has 469hp but runs the quarter in a whole second faster than the STS-V. Mid low 12s vs. mid low 13s for the STS-V. The torque of the the E55 (514) vs. the STS-V (439) is likely the reason but you'd think with 469hp the STS-V would trap higher than 106mph.
Who wants to bet that the PCM was pulling timing big time torque management.
03-21-2007, 08:17 PM
#26
Senior Member
Posts like a Northstar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Robertsdale Alabama
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pardon my ignorance, but is that a Corvette with Caddie sheet metal? I like that over a vette. And whats all that horsepower without a HUD?
03-22-2007, 01:51 AM
#27
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Wickliffe, Ohio
Posts: 2,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BonneAlien
I'd rather have a CTS-V ... the STS just looks like a bigger and uglier version of the CTS. I'm sure the LS2 400hp would keep me happy
Ed
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
The Dude
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
3
09-18-2008 10:14 PM