Bonneville Auto Wrecking - 4 Megabytes
Yea I use a $2000 camera with a $1000 lens you wont be getting that Much Depth of Feild but you can get some with a Point and shoot(is that what you have). Hey can you accept PMs yet?? I am 6$ in the hole with you haha. I need your address again
Thread Starter
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,545
Likes: 1
From: Twin Falls, Idaho

Originally Posted by GXP_Vince
Yea I use a $2000 camera with a $1000 lens you wont be getting that Much Depth of Feild but you can get some with a Point and shoot(is that what you have). Hey can you accept PMs yet?? I am 6$ in the hole with you haha. I need your address again
is the olympus a digital SLR? 14 -45 is pretty wide I like that =) ( you probly know this but maybe not digital cameras have a 1.5 magnifaction on the lenses. ex: 200mm would actually be a 350mm to film.) I work with a 12-24 its great. a 40-150 wouldnt be good for landscapes if that is what you mean by nature but would be great for bugs and animals and sorts. I have a 80-200 f2.8. That is great for portraits and my car shots to throw the background out. I am going to post a thread soon on the basics of photography I know there is one but I am going to add a little.
Originally Posted by Hans
The car looks like crap in real life. Its nearing 200,000 miles fast and has quite a few rock chips and scratches. But hey....it looks ok in pictures though. Whats that expression....something along the lines of "dont step closer than 10 feet to the car or it looks like crap"
I love silver. it does not show ANYTHING as far as blemishes go. The car looks brand new from 20 feet away.
I love silver. it does not show ANYTHING as far as blemishes go. The car looks brand new from 20 feet away.
You have the 20 foot viewing..mines more like 100ft with black and part of the bumper still cut off.
Looking very nice, good choice on headrest positioning.... both up or both down from what I noticed.






