1994 SSEI 1/4 Mile Time
02-09-2005, 01:37 PM
#4
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bolingbrook, IL Location: Clarkston, MI
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I ran a 15.5 with a 2.4 60' 
in a $600 stock '92 SSEi. I did have some weight reductions and good track prep tho. If I could of gotten a better 60', I would of hit low 15'* - factory freek maybe? But I'd say unless you can get a really good 60' your going to be high 15'*.
in a $600 stock '92 SSEi. I did have some weight reductions and good track prep tho. If I could of gotten a better 60', I would of hit low 15'* - factory freek maybe? But I'd say unless you can get a really good 60' your going to be high 15'*.
02-09-2005, 02:12 PM
#5
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 19,756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by llBlazin_llLo
I ran a 15.5 with a 2.4 60' in a $600 stock '92 SSEi. I did have some weight reductions and good track prep tho. If I could of gotten a better 60', I would of hit low 15'* - factory freek maybe? But I'd say unless you can get a really good 60' your going to be high 15'*.
in a $600 stock '92 SSEi. I did have some weight reductions and good track prep tho. If I could of gotten a better 60', I would of hit low 15'* - factory freek maybe? But I'd say unless you can get a really good 60' your going to be high 15'*.
02-10-2005, 04:27 PM
#6
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sauk Centre, MN
Posts: 5,459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
llBlazin_llLo:
Your 1992 SSEi has 205 HP and 260 lb ft of torque stock (which I'm sure you knew)
and the 1994/1995 SSEi was upped to 225 hp and 275 lb ft due to a different TB and teflon coated M62 rotors, and a couple other small updates (and downgrades like a .35" larger SC pulley).
Yeah, I'd say that a 1994 SSEi in stock form (the same form that was used when the magazine'* tested them new) would probably be around 15.6-15.75, maybe even as low as 15.5 with a good solid 2.2 60', and temps around 70*F. Mph should be 87-89 mph.
Your 1992 SSEi has 205 HP and 260 lb ft of torque stock (which I'm sure you knew)
and the 1994/1995 SSEi was upped to 225 hp and 275 lb ft due to a different TB and teflon coated M62 rotors, and a couple other small updates (and downgrades like a .35" larger SC pulley). Yeah, I'd say that a 1994 SSEi in stock form (the same form that was used when the magazine'* tested them new) would probably be around 15.6-15.75, maybe even as low as 15.5 with a good solid 2.2 60', and temps around 70*F. Mph should be 87-89 mph.
02-10-2005, 04:31 PM
#7
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
There are absolutely no differences between the 93 and the 94/95 SSEi Engines or Transmissions. Only the TB and different (more efficient) blower revision, that requires fewer rpm'* to develop the same boost level....hence the larger pulley.
02-10-2005, 08:38 PM
#8
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bolingbrook, IL Location: Clarkston, MI
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by OLBlueEyesBonne
llBlazin_llLo:
Your 1992 SSEi has 205 HP and 260 lb ft of torque stock (which I'm sure you knew) and the 1994/1995 SSEi was upped to 225 hp and 275 lb ft due to a different TB and teflon coated M62 rotors, and a couple other small updates (and downgrades like a .35" larger SC pulley).
Yeah, I'd say that a 1994 SSEi in stock form (the same form that was used when the magazine'* tested them new) would probably be around 15.6-15.75, maybe even as low as 15.5 with a good solid 2.2 60', and temps around 70*F. Mph should be 87-89 mph.
Your 1992 SSEi has 205 HP and 260 lb ft of torque stock (which I'm sure you knew)
and the 1994/1995 SSEi was upped to 225 hp and 275 lb ft due to a different TB and teflon coated M62 rotors, and a couple other small updates (and downgrades like a .35" larger SC pulley). Yeah, I'd say that a 1994 SSEi in stock form (the same form that was used when the magazine'* tested them new) would probably be around 15.6-15.75, maybe even as low as 15.5 with a good solid 2.2 60', and temps around 70*F. Mph should be 87-89 mph.
Where was I off in saying what I did:
Originally Posted by llBlazin_llLo
But I'd say unless you can get a really good 60' your going to be high 15'*.
)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post