thrasher cai??? IAT extention
Originally Posted by radomirthegreat
13secGTP noted he got a better 1/4 mile time at the track on a hot day with a Thrasher than with an Intense FWI. Freak accident?
Originally Posted by GoldenBullet
Originally Posted by radomirthegreat
13secGTP noted he got a better 1/4 mile time at the track on a hot day with a Thrasher than with an Intense FWI. Freak accident?
Thread Starter
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Moncton, New Brunswick ... Canada

jeez wish my engine was looking like that ...than again what can i and can i not do with a se apposed to a ssei? pulley swap was already a let down....but the fenderwell sounds good
Originally Posted by radomirthegreat
Originally Posted by GoldenBullet
Originally Posted by radomirthegreat
13secGTP noted he got a better 1/4 mile time at the track on a hot day with a Thrasher than with an Intense FWI. Freak accident?
specs:
99 GT lost .2 with the Intense FWI (note this car also lost .2 with a DHP PCM). Also keep in mind this car is/was one of faster NA GPs. 14.2@96. This car has always done it best with a HAI.
97 GTP.. no noticeable difference between Intense FWI, SLP, Thrasher, HAI.
All were done on the same day at NRP (summitt raceway park now), at 90* temps.
As far as the extension, you don't need it for the Thrasher setup. The Intense FWI doesn't require the extension either, however you can relocate the IAT to the fender well for a minimal gain..
99 GT lost .2 with the Intense FWI (note this car also lost .2 with a DHP PCM). Also keep in mind this car is/was one of faster NA GPs. 14.2@96. This car has always done it best with a HAI.
97 GTP.. no noticeable difference between Intense FWI, SLP, Thrasher, HAI.
All were done on the same day at NRP (summitt raceway park now), at 90* temps.
As far as the extension, you don't need it for the Thrasher setup. The Intense FWI doesn't require the extension either, however you can relocate the IAT to the fender well for a minimal gain..


