ls2 in 2000 sle
01-26-2006, 01:52 AM
#21
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Originally Posted by llBlazin_llLo
Originally Posted by LittleHoov
Step 1. sell LS2 engine out of Corvette
Step 2. Buy sweet turbo setup for 3800
Step 3. Take leftover money and...do whatever you want too with it.
Step 1. sell LS2 engine out of Corvette
Step 2. Buy sweet turbo setup for 3800
Step 3. Take leftover money and...save up for a trans that will handle the power.
Step 1. Sell LS2 engine out of corvette, they go for several thousand....
Step 2. Sell the slow bonneville
Step 3. Take all money and buy a sweet SSEi and add a few mods to make it as fast as if a LS2 was in there.....
01-26-2006, 12:21 PM
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
The LS4 in the GP and Impalls are rated for 303 HP and 300 ft lbs I think... My guess is its detuned for the trans... The trans is supposedly beefed up to handle the LS4 V8 tho...
Now how about an LS4 with an M112 or something.... Drool
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Now how about an LS4 with an M112 or something.... Drool
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
:P 
01-29-2006, 10:12 PM
#25
Okay, an LS2 in a FWD car... Torque steer anyways it would be sweet and should fit. Sh*t they put a 4.6L N* in them and had left over room. A 6.0L should fit if a 5.3 fits in a Grandprix. Good luck finding a tranny that will put up with that kind of power. Uhhh a 4T80 is your best bet. Should hook up okay. Should key word here. Look into it some more. Don't make it rwd no that would be a pain!
01-30-2006, 04:47 PM
#27
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by fantastic88
If you want a swap, just do a L67 swap. They can be made to be way faster than the FWD LS2.
I agree. The L67 or LS4 can assomplish much more than the LS2 and is lighter.
The DOD engine is a very nice revving engine.
01-31-2006, 09:47 PM
#28
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Montréal, QC
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BillBoost37
While GM will have some RWD soon enough..
Why go backward in technology? Seems silly.
Why go backward in technology? Seems silly.
Cheers,
01-31-2006, 09:48 PM
#29
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 19,756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Foghorn
Originally Posted by BillBoost37
While GM will have some RWD soon enough..
Why go backward in technology? Seems silly.
Why go backward in technology? Seems silly.
Cheers,
i do my trans dosent
02-01-2006, 12:19 AM
#30
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: INDIANA
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
until you drive a car that has a ls2 in it you will not understand. once you do u will want one in every car you drive. i get 28 mpg in my vette and i drive it hard!!!! i do not want a drag car i just want a nice, big bad *** full size sports sedan that is reliable gets ggod mileage and hauls booty...not to mention have you seen another one...no no you havent and for me that is the whole reason...time will tell. and no not the ls7 a mti resleeved ls2 that is bored and stroked to 427. the long block is 3 grade and go from there