Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning Talk about modifications, or anything else associated with performance enhancements. Have a new idea for performance/reliability? Post it here. No idea is stupid! (please use Detailing and Appearance for cosmetic ideas)

Gut Airbox vs. Cone Filter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 4, 2008 | 11:29 AM
  #1  
CharlieJ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Southeastern USA
CharlieJ is on a distinguished road
Question Gut Airbox vs. Cone Filter

I'm looking for an inexpensive mod to add a few HP and MPG to my 2004 Bonneville SE. I've read about gutting the airbox -- and that seems like a good idea. I've also thought about simply taking the airbox out of the equation and simply putting on a cone filter.

Will the cone filter (sans airbox) work just as good?
What are the advantages / disadvantages?
Which brand is better -- keeping "inexpensive mod" as the theme?

THANKS!
CharlieJ
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2008 | 01:30 PM
  #2  
boott's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: CO, USA
boott is on a distinguished road
Default

There'* no significant gain either way. With the gutted box/cone you'll get more air into the engine that'll allow it to run a little more efficiant. Some guys say the cone allows more air into the engine then the gutted box. Bottom line: More air equals more sucking noise which makes folks believe car runs faster. All in all there'* posts that claim a intake mod alone yields about 5-7 hp max.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2008 | 02:39 PM
  #3  
CharlieJ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Southeastern USA
CharlieJ is on a distinguished road
Default

THANKS!

I'm looking to give the car to my soon-to-be 16 yr old daughter, so I don't care if it goes faster. However, I would like to get more MPG out of it. While I have it (these last few months), I'd like to enjoy the power increase, if any (thus the reason for asking about HP).

BTW, the airbox on my car looks nothing like the pictures I've seen on the forum. Mine is HUGE -- and it looks to be two-piece.

Last edited by CharlieJ; Aug 4, 2008 at 02:41 PM. Reason: Clarification
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2008 | 03:54 PM
  #4  
WalterMitty's Avatar
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
WalterMitty is on a distinguished road
Default

I gutted the airbox on a 1998 SE. It made the car noisier, particularly at start up, but gave me no noticable increase in power and no measurable improvement in fuel economy.

In my opinion the factory airbox is not a constraint on either horsepower or fuel economy. In the first case it would only be remotely possible at wide open throttle near max RPM for the airbox to come into play; and in that condition several other factors would be more important.

In the second case, fuel economy is controlled via a feedback system including the O2 sensor(*) and computer programming; so if the system was restricted the ECM would adjust the air fuel ratio to deliver the right fuel economy.

Back in the bad old days (when carburetors ruled the earth) restrictive air intake, usually caused by poor maintenance and clogged filters, power and economy could be improved by cheap and simple means. Today with modern engines, computer controls and CAFE standards, all you'll get by gutting the airbox is more noise.

If that'* your cup of tea, break out the dremel!
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 08:25 PM
  #5  
iluvmybonnie's Avatar
Village Idiot
Posts like a Turbo
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 280
Likes: 1
iluvmybonnie is on a distinguished road
Default

neither.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
duncan
1987-1991
9
Nov 29, 2009 05:39 PM
egladman
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
21
Feb 20, 2008 03:10 AM
rjolly87
Lounge
6
Dec 6, 2007 06:55 PM
GXP Venom
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
19
Feb 25, 2006 03:35 PM
hvactech
2000-2005
6
Dec 24, 2005 01:54 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:04 AM.