Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning Talk about modifications, or anything else associated with performance enhancements. Have a new idea for performance/reliability? Post it here. No idea is stupid! (please use Detailing and Appearance for cosmetic ideas)

Finally dynoed the Bonnie.

Old Dec 4, 2005 | 09:03 PM
  #1  
96SSEi_tampa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, FL
96SSEi_tampa is on a distinguished road
Default Finally dynoed the Bonnie.

So, I had the Bonneville dynoed at the car show we hosted at my school today, and did all right. For some reason the engine wouldn't rev higher than ~4700 without hitting some sort of limiter even though I've run it as high as 5700rpm at the track. We also weren't able to get on the gas until the revs were around 3800-4000, past peak torque, without the car downshifting. The runs were done in 2nd gear since 3rd goes past the 129mph speed limiter on the car.

Anyways...
180.4whp @ 4679rpm; the power was still building before it hit the limiter so the dyno guy figures around 195whp if the engine would've kept going.

223.7lb-ft @ 4007rpm; I figure 230-240 back down at the ~3200rpm peak torque.

Not bad for a nine year old car with 105,000miles in need of an oil change.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2005 | 09:05 PM
  #2  
SSEimatt93's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,135
Likes: 1
From: Lethbridge, Alberta, _______Canada._______ West Coast Bonneville Fest ___05,06,07 Survivor___
SSEimatt93 is on a distinguished road
Default

thats not bad wheel HP at all, considering your engine is rated at 240 Crank HP from the factory
It downshifts at WOT to get back into a higher power ban, which, really helps on the highway when u need to make a WOT pass.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2005 | 09:10 PM
  #3  
96SSEi_tampa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, FL
96SSEi_tampa is on a distinguished road
Default

Downshifting is a no-no on a dyno though. :( This was also the third pull. They were done back to back with no cool down, so everything was a little heatsoaked. What'* great is that the first dyno pull registered 344.3lb-ft.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2005 | 09:14 PM
  #4  
SSEimatt93's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,135
Likes: 1
From: Lethbridge, Alberta, _______Canada._______ West Coast Bonneville Fest ___05,06,07 Survivor___
SSEimatt93 is on a distinguished road
Default

If only that were true eh..hahaha..bye bye front tires
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2005 | 11:46 PM
  #5  
1993 SLE's Avatar
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 19,756
Likes: 1
1993 SLE is on a distinguished road
Default

you needed to keep the shifter on 2nd....
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2005 | 12:23 AM
  #6  
ELMACHOGERACHO's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 0
From: South Bend, IN (hometown) Indianapolis,IN (college)
ELMACHOGERACHO is on a distinguished road
Default

i think i will get to dyno my car for my engine performance class...... once my tranny is rebuilt ,of course
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2005 | 08:59 AM
  #7  
96SSEi_tampa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, FL
96SSEi_tampa is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by 1993 SLE
you needed to keep the shifter on 2nd....
We did. Looking back over the graph, the engine cut out at a similated 129mph once corrections were made for the gear ratio. :? The runs were done on a dynopack instead of a rolling dyno. Would that make any difference in what the car'* computer is seeing compared to running on the street?
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2005 | 01:13 PM
  #8  
fantastic88's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,328
Likes: 1
From: Lakeville, MN
fantastic88 is on a distinguished road
Default

Good job. I don't know how accurate dynoes are though. These engines have such HUGE differences in dyno results. Case in point; you're engine is stock as was mine when I did a dyno pull. I dynoed 209 whp, you dynoed 180 whp. However, we both have the same 92mph trap speed in the quarter. One of our dynoes was way off.

BTW- does 60ft have anything to do with trap speed? I know it affects you're ET.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2005 | 01:53 PM
  #9  
96SSEi_tampa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, FL
96SSEi_tampa is on a distinguished road
Default

My 180hp wasn't at 5200rpm where our peak horsepower occurs. All of the dyno guys agreed that with the way the graph pulled we should have seen ~195whp or around 250 crank horsepower.

I'm wondering about the accuracy of the dynos though. On the time in my sig, my 1/8 mile was at 9.625 @ 73.08mph. What was yours? I'm just wondering how much each car picked up in the back half where horsepower matters most.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2005 | 07:18 PM
  #10  
Greyhare's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a Northstar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 533
Likes: 1
From: Purgatory
Greyhare is on a distinguished road
Default

The differance does not suprise me. Those are very different dyno setups.
It may not seem logical but different setups both calibrated will give very different results.

When comparing numbers the best is numbers from the same dyno, next is numbers from the same make and model dyno and, last from the same make.

If you run the same car on a Dynopak, a Mustang and, a Dynojet back to back you will get three different numbers.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:28 PM.