Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning Talk about modifications, or anything else associated with performance enhancements. Have a new idea for performance/reliability? Post it here. No idea is stupid! (please use Detailing and Appearance for cosmetic ideas)

ER rocker info

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 2, 2007 | 09:24 PM
  #1  
95naSTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,508
Likes: 2
From: Philly
95naSTA is on a distinguished road
Default ER rocker info

For those interested in the best n/a L36 rocker ratio, check out this thread. Wizbang is the one who did all the testing and development for the now ZZP rockers.
Reply
Old May 2, 2007 | 10:06 PM
  #2  
TJ'sblackbonne's Avatar
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,037
Likes: 0
From: plattsburgh NY
TJ'sblackbonne is on a distinguished road
Default

I was going to post this and i saw you did, thanx mike
Reply
Old May 2, 2007 | 10:09 PM
  #3  
mike1053's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: republic, mo
mike1053 is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by TJ'sblackbonne
I was going to post this and i saw you did, thanx mike
I wondered and now I am going for a Freak of nature if you will on other thread...
Reply
Old May 3, 2007 | 12:02 AM
  #4  
agrazela's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
agrazela is on a distinguished road
Default

Awesome post, thanks. I especially like these tidbits:

Replace the stock valve springs ONLY on the Intake Valves. Leave the stock springs on the Exhaust Valves. The Exhaust Valves with stock springs and ER Rockers have been tested to near 7,000 RPM and do not float. Installing heavier springs is only adding to parasitic HP loss and additional valvetrain stress and wear.

High mileage (stock or otherwise) valve springs are not bad by any rationale or by virtue of their age or length of service. In fact, they actually have a higher reliability due to their age and use. This is because springs undergo a type of stress relieving called aging and elevating temperatures increases the rate at which the steel ages. As the springs undergo this stress relieving, they will loose some spring rate or tension. The rate at which they loose their tension decreases asymptotically with time. This means they undergo much of their stress relieving early in their service life and much less later on. If a valve spring is manufactured properly, they will not undergo fatigue failure. I would have higher confidence in springs that have been in service for 100K miles than new springs. The older springs have proven not have any defects in the metal that will lead to a premature failure. These older springs have withstood the test of time. Regardless of the decrease in spring rate, the springs will far out-last the engine in all respects.
Since I was considering the possibility of leaving the stock springs on the exhaust with my SR rockers, and swapping in stronger on the 1.85 intakes only...now I know that'* recommended

In fact, I plan to test whether the 1.8'* are even needed on the exhaust, or the stock 1.6 is adequate.
Reply
Old May 3, 2007 | 01:21 AM
  #5  
hawkjet's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
From: Santa Rosa, CA
hawkjet is on a distinguished road
Default

For those looking at ZZP ER Rockers, be sure to look at this:

http://www.easyperformance.com/Tech_...t_Content.html

It gives real data and dyno test results.
Reply
Old May 3, 2007 | 08:27 AM
  #6  
willwren's Avatar
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 11
Likes: 13
willwren is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by mike1053
Originally Posted by TJ'sblackbonne
I was going to post this and i saw you did, thanx mike
I wondered and now I am going for a Freak of nature if you will on other thread...
Not sure what you're talking about, Mike, but these rockers won't work for your car. You have a different engine.
Reply
Old May 3, 2007 | 11:39 AM
  #7  
agrazela's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
agrazela is on a distinguished road
Default Re: ER rocker info

Originally Posted by 95naSTA
For those interested in the best n/a L36 rocker ratio, check out this thread. Wizbang is the one who did all the testing and development for the now ZZP rockers.
In thinking about wizbang'* post a bit more...

Do you have any info on how he tested that stock springs can handle 1.8+ ratios and up to 7k rpm'*? This is definitely the first time I've ever heard anyone assert that this was a safe practice...
Reply
Old May 3, 2007 | 12:50 PM
  #8  
95naSTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,508
Likes: 2
From: Philly
95naSTA is on a distinguished road
Default

Other than that easy performance article and that new thread, I don't really have any other info.
I know he has dynoed his car probably more than any other gpgt owner though..
Reply
Old May 3, 2007 | 03:56 PM
  #9  
big_news_1's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,459
Likes: 1
From: Glendale, AZ
big_news_1 is on a distinguished road
Default

That is an excellent thread.... thank you very much for posting. I'll have to make sure Doug sees this one as well...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ryan2Dope
1992-1999
10
Apr 2, 2004 08:50 PM
Burgundy_Boat
Audio (and aftermarket electronics)
11
Mar 27, 2004 01:34 AM
aukc
1992-1999
6
Oct 4, 2003 06:59 PM
Luke Greffen
1992-1999
8
Apr 2, 2003 11:55 PM
bonnieboy23
General GM Chat
3
Feb 28, 2003 01:08 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:58 AM.