Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning Talk about modifications, or anything else associated with performance enhancements. Have a new idea for performance/reliability? Post it here. No idea is stupid! (please use Detailing and Appearance for cosmetic ideas)

Do you guys think the same as this guy?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 22, 2003 | 07:33 PM
  #1  
Djomla's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a 4 Banger
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: Portland,ME
Djomla is on a distinguished road
Default Do you guys think the same as this guy?

http://www.gmtips.com/3rd-degree/dox...maf-screen.htm
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2003 | 07:44 PM
  #2  
willwren's Avatar
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 11
Likes: 13
willwren is on a distinguished road
Default

On whatever car he'* talking about, he may be right.

I've been preaching about laminar airflow for some time now. Read the airbox mod article in Techinfo. With a stock airbox, leave it in. I agree that far. But with a custom intake, and the laminar flow it provides, you CAN safely remove the screen for less restriction. I have yet to see a failed MAF sensor caused by this, and until I do, I'll continue to say that this is a 'safe' mod. From my own personal experience.

The lean condition he talks about doesn't apply to my car, at least. I have an Actron scantool. My MAF and O2 sensor functions are unaffected and unharmed. My A/F ratio is perfect.

This makes the ECM lean out the fuel mixture and add timing. Then the oxygen sensors read the lean fuel mixture and bump it back up to compensate for the MAF sensors low readings.
This is not the case on my car at all. My A/F ratio and timing are normal. The PCM can adapt to these minor changes.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2003 | 07:45 PM
  #3  
LittleHoov's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,493
Likes: 0
From: Climax Springs, Missouri
LittleHoov is on a distinguished road
Default

yeah i think most of us feel the same way. the only time the MAF screen removal really helps is when you have an aftermarket intake.that has a smoother tube therefore creating less turbulence. if your intake doesnt make that much turbulence then the MAF doesnt have that much to do. but if you still using the stock airbox then its best to keep it in.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2003 | 07:56 PM
  #4  
TrueWildMan's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,246
Likes: 3
From: Salina, KS
TrueWildMan is on a distinguished road
Default

Here'* a good thread on that very question.

http://www.bonnevilleclub.com/forum/...screen+removal
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2003 | 12:07 AM
  #5  
MOS95B's Avatar
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 15,408
Likes: 1
From: Robbinsdale, MN
MOS95B is on a distinguished road
Default

I just have to be the fly in the ointment, huh? I gutted my stock airbox, opend the front end up, and removed the screen. Everything runs fine...
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2003 | 08:07 PM
  #6  
Glasuan's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a Northstar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo Grove, IL
Glasuan is on a distinguished road
Default

Right but with a gutted and front opened airbox, you are creating a lot more airflow, like going from 2/10 to 6/10. The ADTR is like a 9/10. So the MAF removal may have helped you a bit.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2003 | 11:47 PM
  #7  
MOS95B's Avatar
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 15,408
Likes: 1
From: Robbinsdale, MN
MOS95B is on a distinguished road
Default

I was wondering about that. Thanks!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bmsgaffer86
General GM Chat
18
Feb 23, 2005 10:07 AM
MOS95B
Lounge
11
Feb 13, 2004 12:36 AM
kwikshifter
1992-1999
2
Feb 25, 2003 07:46 PM
99BonnevilleSE
General GM Chat
12
Oct 9, 2002 02:50 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:25 AM.