Lounge For casual talk about things unrelated to General Motors. In other words, off-topic stuff. And anything else that does not fit Section Description.

SUV / Small Truck Recomendations

Old Jun 27, 2006 | 01:23 PM
  #11  
bandit's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,029
Likes: 1
From: NEBF:06,07 | NYBF:06,07 | ONBF:06,07 | CNBF:06 & more............
bandit is on a distinguished road
Default

2002 + Jeeps Grand Charokees are really good.. my brothers has had 1 problem yet, and hes put over 50K miles on it so far, it have like 105K on it now.

Get the 4.7 V8, there prety quick...
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2006 | 01:26 PM
  #12  
Shadow's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,239
Likes: 1
From: Delaware & Long Island NY
Shadow is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by bandit
2002 + Jeeps Grand Charokees are really good.. my brothers has had 1 problem yet, and hes put over 50K miles on it so far, it have like 105K on it now.

Get the 4.7 V8, there prety quick...

Even the 4.0 ones are quick.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2006 | 01:29 PM
  #13  
SSsuperchargedEi's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,551
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, Pa.
SSsuperchargedEi is on a distinguished road
Default

eitehr a ZJ or WJ grand cherokee... best bang for the buck in the SUV market
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2006 | 01:32 PM
  #14  
bandit's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,029
Likes: 1
From: NEBF:06,07 | NYBF:06,07 | ONBF:06,07 | CNBF:06 & more............
bandit is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by Shadow
Originally Posted by bandit
2002 + Jeeps Grand Charokees are really good.. my brothers has had 1 problem yet, and hes put over 50K miles on it so far, it have like 105K on it now.

Get the 4.7 V8, there prety quick...

Even the 4.0 ones are quick.
the 4.0 are only quick if its not a grand charokee, if its a regular one then yeah cuz there alot lighter. but the grand charokees with the 4.0 i can WHIP!
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2006 | 02:08 PM
  #15  
BillBoost37's Avatar
DINOSAURUS BOOSTUS

Expert Gearhead
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 41,391
Likes: 30
From: Enfield, CT
BillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Toasty...if you wanna buy a gas station and new transmission...buy a Dodge...

(Sorry guys..experience of many)

Jim...Toasty'* getting a mommy mobile?
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2006 | 02:18 PM
  #16  
PRD2BDF's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,064
Likes: 0
From: August 07 COTM....NEBF '06, CEBF '06 OHMM '06 ONBF '07 CEBF '07
PRD2BDF is on a distinguished road
Default

I like S10s myself. Buy a V6 with a long bed and a stick then go drifitng.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2006 | 02:20 PM
  #17  
Bonneville92V688's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: Purgatory
Bonneville92V688 is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by toastedoats
Originally Posted by Bonneville94V688
Stay away from the Dodge Durango'*. They are highly reliable, but the MPG'* will kill you. My dad has a 2003 (last of the 1st generation) and it kills him on gas. His city mileage is about 11.5 to 12. I will reccommend a 96 and up S10 Blazer... not the 95. It has the garbage 1st gen CPI injection (not TBI, which is still garbage). I also reccommend a used (don't hurt me) a 95-02 Kia Sportage. From the people I know that had them, they are highly reliable and gave them little to no trouble.
im more concened with reliability than gas mileage.. what motor does your dad have for a motor in his? And no, i wouldnt ever touch a S10 with CPI.
He has a 4.7 in his Durango. It has alot of kick to it, but at the same time, eats gas like a starving dog! But yes, the Durango'* are very reliable. IF you do decide on one, please stick with the 4.7 as they have the 545RFE transmission that is far more reliable than some of the older transmissions in those.

And cheetah, I do agree with you on them being reliable, but I had really bad luck with the 88 S10 Blazer I had, so it prolly made me biased.

But I still do recommend a GM. I try to get my dad to get a GM, but he has negative equity.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2006 | 02:22 PM
  #18  
ssei1995's Avatar
!! UNCONFIRMED EMAIL !!
Posts like a Northstar
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
ssei1995 is on a distinguished road
Default

If you get a GM version such as an *-10, get a 4.3, V-6 powered version. The 2.8/3.1 version is known to wipe rod bearings and snap crankshaft at the sligthtest sing of detonation.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2006 | 02:54 PM
  #19  
GXP Venom's Avatar
Administratus Emeritus
Certified Car Nut
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,539
Likes: 18
From: Purgatory, Pennsylvania
GXP Venom is on a distinguished road
Default

Had several *-10'* over the years and prefer the 4.3 also. I wiped out rod bearings as well on a 2.8 but to it'* credit, it had a hard life and didnt come apart till 150,000..The dam galvanized boxes wasnt a good idea either. Galvanic corrosion destroyed the outside box on both of them. To give you an idea of what the 2.8 went thru... we put 8 inch u-bolts on the rear end, stacked 9 springs and an overload on each side and put a ton of stone on a pallet 3 times a day. My brakes didnt want to hold the hill coming out of an old abandoned quarry so I would put the truck in reverse and as I felt the brakes start to give, I would feather the clutch in reverse going forward. Now that was nuts and a tough truck all at the same time.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2006 | 02:55 PM
  #20  
Bonneville92V688's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: Purgatory
Bonneville92V688 is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by GXP Venom
Had several *-10'* over the years and prefer the 4.3 also. I wiped out rod bearings as well on a 2.8 but to it'* credit, it had a hard life and didnt come apart till 150,000..The dam galvanized boxes wasnt a good idea either. Galvanic corrosion destroyed the outside box on both of them. To give you an idea of what the 2.8 went thru... we put 8 inch u-bolts on the rear end, stacked 9 springs and an overload on each side and put a ton of stone on a pallet 3 times a day. My brakes didnt want to hold the hill coming out of an old abandoned quarry so I would put the truck in reverse and as I felt the brakes start to give, I would feather the clutch in reverse going forward. Now that was nuts and a tough truck all at the same time.
S10'* are tough. I'd like to see a 80'* Ford ranger try to do what you did. No offense.
Reply


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:41 AM.