AutoCad 2000
#3
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
I had it. And I was recently 'forced' to upgrade to 2007.
2007 SUCKS. I don't use it too often though. Most of my design work is done in 3D.
I liked 2000 far better than I like 2007 fwiw.
2007 SUCKS. I don't use it too often though. Most of my design work is done in 3D.
I liked 2000 far better than I like 2007 fwiw.
#4
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere south of Ottawa with your girlfriend driving faster then you.
Posts: 3,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Okay nuff said..
second part of the question. Is it a huge program to run say bigger then PhotoShop cs3 ?
second part of the question. Is it a huge program to run say bigger then PhotoShop cs3 ?
#8
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have used 2000, 2002, 2004 and 2005
Where I work uses 2002 so that what I have on my notebook (Which is use at work), my home computers I have 2004 for no reason
AutoCAD isn't too bad to learn, unless you start doing 3D and you haven't used a program like this before, it may be a little more difficult
We use a AutoCAD for all the 2D drawings, and we use Inventor for 3D
Where I work uses 2002 so that what I have on my notebook (Which is use at work), my home computers I have 2004 for no reason
AutoCAD isn't too bad to learn, unless you start doing 3D and you haven't used a program like this before, it may be a little more difficult
We use a AutoCAD for all the 2D drawings, and we use Inventor for 3D