they didnt make an 05. do you mean 300limited?

I have never been a fan of those cars. but thats just my 2 cents

0-60 it prolly isn't any quicker that you're car.

they seem reliable enough, at least about or more so than the 2000+ bonnies.

that one looks good. i like it. shame no new ones comin.

Nice car! 11.5 is a bit much but maybe its really low miles or something ('02s are going for 10.5 here)
That 3.5 is a sweet engine! Its really built well but there is a recall on it for the injector o-rings if it hasn't been done already. You'll get 200k out of her easy. At least my intrpeid was recalled for it...
I miss that car...totalled on Christmas eve thanks to a drunk driver in a hemi magnum

Ooops, no I meant she has an 04.

And fantastic, I was looking at the specs, and the Chrysler has more HP and torque, but my HP to torque ratio is greater.

I drove the car home tonight, and it is a good driving car. The brakes are a bit touchy, and I had to slam on brakes for a deer, and I got dead-pedal at half way. The steering is good, acceleration is OK. BUT, I am a 5'7" driver, and with the seat in the correct position, I can't reach anything without leaning foreward! None of the steering wheel controls light up at night.

What?!? Thats sh*tty. Even my old 93' 88 beaters steering wheel controls would light up. Sounds like the acceleration is unimpressive too. Even with 252hp Chrysler trannies have a tremendous power loss to the wheels. I'd be willing to bet that if dynoed for wheel hp a 252hp 3.5 would be very similar to the 3800 Ser2 NA. Even though our trannies arn't the most reliable at least they are very efficiant at putting the power down.

I'd race it.

I would too. I've rode in one and they're pretty sluggish for 250HP.