Lounge For casual talk about things unrelated to General Motors. In other words, off-topic stuff. And anything else that does not fit Section Description.

Hard Drives

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 10, 2010 | 09:10 PM
  #11  
ymmot04's Avatar
Thread Starter
-- SITE DONATOR --
True Car Nut
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 6
ymmot04 is a glorious beacon of lightymmot04 is a glorious beacon of lightymmot04 is a glorious beacon of lightymmot04 is a glorious beacon of lightymmot04 is a glorious beacon of lightymmot04 is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Originally Posted by SignOfZeta
Software and onboard RAID used to be really taxing on the CPU when it was first introduced, but those observations were made in the Pentium II and Pentium III days. Since then, processors have gotten much faster, gone 64-bit, and gained more cores; now, we're to the point that things like software RAID or full drive encryption feel transparent.

Similarly, I'm using BitLocker (full drive encryption) on one of my notebooks, and feeling zero performance penalty compared to when it was unencrypted.

Of course, if I had the feasible option, I'd pop in a hardware RAID controller.
I'm looking into BitLocker at work, good information to know, thanks.

Originally Posted by xtremerevolution
I know he has an overclocked i7, but this still takes a toll on your memory subsystem. Its data throughput that is constantly processed when you're using the computer. RAID 5 will put a huge load on any RAID controller.

Will he notice? Probably not. I guess part of the reason is that is I simply don't trust motherboard RAID. I have motherboard RAID on my motherboard right now with two 500GB drives in a RAID 1, and the write performance is pitiful compared to the 3 SCSI drive RAID 5 with the dedicated controller.
The Intel RAID chip on my motherboard is actually supposed to be pretty reliable, and so far I've had no issues with it. The JMicron controllers on the other hand.... lets not go there.

I've been chancing it for too long with my data, RAID 10 should give me the extra performance I want and security I need. Like you guys have said, with the system overclocked like it I have it I shouldn't notice much overhead, definitely not enough to deter me. I'll look into a RAID card for the next board.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2010 | 09:14 PM
  #12  
yutzybrian's Avatar
Artist
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,283
Likes: 50
From: USA
yutzybrian is a splendid one to beholdyutzybrian is a splendid one to beholdyutzybrian is a splendid one to beholdyutzybrian is a splendid one to beholdyutzybrian is a splendid one to beholdyutzybrian is a splendid one to beholdyutzybrian is a splendid one to behold
Default

Originally Posted by ymmot04
I'm looking into BitLocker at work, good information to know, thanks.
TrueCrypt works much much better. No back doors built into it
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2010 | 09:15 PM
  #13  
ymmot04's Avatar
Thread Starter
-- SITE DONATOR --
True Car Nut
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 6
ymmot04 is a glorious beacon of lightymmot04 is a glorious beacon of lightymmot04 is a glorious beacon of lightymmot04 is a glorious beacon of lightymmot04 is a glorious beacon of lightymmot04 is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Originally Posted by yutzybrian
TrueCrypt works much much better. No back doors built into it
I don't doubt that, central management is going to be an issue with 900 users though.
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2010 | 12:10 PM
  #14  
SignOfZeta's Avatar
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,284
Likes: 20
From: New Milford, CT
SignOfZeta has a spectacular aura aboutSignOfZeta has a spectacular aura about
Default

Originally Posted by ymmot04
I don't doubt that, central management is going to be an issue with 900 users though.
Indeed. Domains hosted on Windows Server 2008 or newer support key escrow, and 2008 R2 supports backing up recovery keys for BitLocker To Go into the AD schema.

You'll need either the Enterprise or Ultimate versions of Windows Vista or Windows 7, as well as a TPM 1.2 chip in each of your 900 systems. (Or 900 flash drives and 900 users who won't lose them.)
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2010 | 12:23 PM
  #15  
ymmot04's Avatar
Thread Starter
-- SITE DONATOR --
True Car Nut
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 6
ymmot04 is a glorious beacon of lightymmot04 is a glorious beacon of lightymmot04 is a glorious beacon of lightymmot04 is a glorious beacon of lightymmot04 is a glorious beacon of lightymmot04 is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Originally Posted by SignOfZeta
Indeed. Domains hosted on Windows Server 2008 or newer support key escrow, and 2008 R2 supports backing up recovery keys for BitLocker To Go into the AD schema.

You'll need either the Enterprise or Ultimate versions of Windows Vista or Windows 7, as well as a TPM 1.2 chip in each of your 900 systems. (Or 900 flash drives and 900 users who won't lose them.)
Well, I guess being more realistic, not all 900 are going to need encryption. I think this will mostly be used for our field techs and some special cases which accounts for a good 450 anyways. When we migrate to Windows 7 those that need the encryption will receive Ultimate, the rest Pro. Although IIRC the price difference is like $15?
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2010 | 12:29 PM
  #16  
SignOfZeta's Avatar
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,284
Likes: 20
From: New Milford, CT
SignOfZeta has a spectacular aura aboutSignOfZeta has a spectacular aura about
Default

Talk to your company'* computer vendor; while it'* a $20 difference retail, you can probably get a better deal, especially if you're buying 450 licenses (or new computers) at once.

Not sure about pricing for Enterprise, though; it requires you to set up a key server and do volume licensing, but it may be cheaper than Ultimate. Do your homework on that one.
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2010 | 12:35 PM
  #17  
MouSe's Avatar
BANNED
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,989
Likes: 4
From: Usa
MouSe is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by yutzybrian
TrueCrypt works much much better. No back doors built into it
I'm using TrueCrypt on one my external HDD. I hate that the only way I can un-encrypt it is to format it. That sucks because right now I don't have another 1TB HDD to put this stuff onto to format it!
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2010 | 02:36 PM
  #18  
yutzybrian's Avatar
Artist
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,283
Likes: 50
From: USA
yutzybrian is a splendid one to beholdyutzybrian is a splendid one to beholdyutzybrian is a splendid one to beholdyutzybrian is a splendid one to beholdyutzybrian is a splendid one to beholdyutzybrian is a splendid one to beholdyutzybrian is a splendid one to behold
Default

Originally Posted by MouSe
I'm using TrueCrypt on one my external HDD. I hate that the only way I can un-encrypt it is to format it. That sucks because right now I don't have another 1TB HDD to put this stuff onto to format it!
Umm what? My installation of TrueCrypt has a decrypt feature
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2010 | 09:45 PM
  #19  
ymmot04's Avatar
Thread Starter
-- SITE DONATOR --
True Car Nut
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 6
ymmot04 is a glorious beacon of lightymmot04 is a glorious beacon of lightymmot04 is a glorious beacon of lightymmot04 is a glorious beacon of lightymmot04 is a glorious beacon of lightymmot04 is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Got Windows installed on my SSD and talk about snappy, I've never seen windows pop open that fast. No delay like usual. Not sure why I've waited this long to get one.
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2010 | 11:17 PM
  #20  
xtremerevolution's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,478
Likes: 0
From: New Lenox, IL
xtremerevolution is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by ymmot04
Got Windows installed on my SSD and talk about snappy, I've never seen windows pop open that fast. No delay like usual. Not sure why I've waited this long to get one.
This is why a lot of people buy the WD Raptor drives; the latency. Granted, with SSD'* you go from milliseconds to nanoseconds, but the same concept applies. when your file transfers consist of many very small files and not a few very large files, that latency comes into play.

Can't wait till I can afford to get an SSD myself, but I'm waiting until the enterprise drives go down in price a bit. I still think the technology is a bit too primitive.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bonnie94ssei
Lounge
28
Mar 27, 2007 06:56 AM
Hailey
Lounge
2
Jul 28, 2005 01:54 PM
1997_LeSabre
1992-1999
2
Dec 26, 2004 05:04 PM
BonnieBusiness
Lounge
28
Nov 14, 2004 01:43 PM
White Lightning
Lounge
3
Aug 9, 2003 11:28 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:29 AM.