Lounge For casual talk about things unrelated to General Motors. In other words, off-topic stuff. And anything else that does not fit Section Description.

Environmentalists target NASCAR

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 11:07 AM
  #1  
Greyhare's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a Northstar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
From: Purgatory
Greyhare is on a distinguished road
Default Environmentalists target NASCAR

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,149374,00.html
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 11:14 AM
  #2  
scottydl's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a Camaro
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 6
From: Land of Lincoln
scottydl is on a distinguished road
Default

That'* pretty silly.

As the stock car racing season has just kicked off, I'm sure NASCAR won't be too happy if eco-activist protesters start showing up at races wearing gas masks and chanting "Get the lead out!" and "NASCAR pollution lowers kids' IQs!"
If that happens, those tree-huggers better look out for Bubba and his double-barrel shotgun coming their way. You don't mess with hillbillies and their NASCAR!

Seriously tho, I can't imagine that a few hours of slight lead fuel exposure at a NASCAR race is a serious health risk. If you're sucking on the tailpipe maybe, but not sitting hundreds of feet away from the cars in a massive open air arena.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 11:17 AM
  #3  
bmsgaffer86's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 0
bmsgaffer86 is on a distinguished road
Default

Ill be willing to bet them eco-lologistsss never been in a stock car going over 160MPH through a turn....

If they didnt completely turn pro-racing they would pass out from the forces and promptly run over.

:P





Billy Joe would probably busta beer bottle over their head.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 11:31 AM
  #4  
Sol's Avatar
Sol
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,910
Likes: 3
Sol is on a distinguished road
Default

We just can't have fun anymore can we?


I think of myself as an environmentalist at times, but this is nuts.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 12:48 PM
  #5  
willwren's Avatar
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 11
Likes: 12
willwren is on a distinguished road
Default

Tree-huggers can't even DREAM of taking on NASCAR.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 01:39 PM
  #6  
Twister97's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,177
Likes: 0
From: Pennsylvania
Twister97 is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by willwren
Tree-huggers can't even DREAM of taking on NASCAR.
Man, tree huggers dont even dream of chicks
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 02:00 PM
  #7  
scottydl's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a Camaro
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 6
From: Land of Lincoln
scottydl is on a distinguished road
Default

I guess they just dream of trees, LOL ... or hugging trees anyway!



Any self-admitted treehuggers care to comment?
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2005 | 12:36 AM
  #8  
GonneVille's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,816
Likes: 0
GonneVille is on a distinguished road
Default

While I agree that the amount of lead from an average NASCAR race wouldn't have any effect on the environment or on fans, much of the columns arguments for continuing to use leaded fuel are specious.
"Leaded race fuel is less likely to explode."- BS. The 110 octane fuel used by NASCAR is just as flammable as what you or I put in our cars.
"It makes the cars run better."-Also BS, the manufacturers could easily make the changes required to run unleaded fuel, without hurting performance at all. They re-design their engines every year anyways, so the change wouldn't hurt the sport.


The only reason that NASCAR still uses leaded gas is that leading is a cheaper way of raising octane tha the chemicl additives that civilian fuel uses. Changing to unleaded might cost them as much as $1000 a race. Whoopy.

As for aviation engines, the government didn't force the change to unleaded aviation fuel because then they would have had to change all the piston engine aircraft over to unleaded, at extraordinary expense. They could have, however, simply required that all new aircraft be compatible with unleaded fuel.
All of this is from the horse'* mouth, my Father. He'* been with the EPA for 27 years.

And, no, I ain't no damn tree-hugger, I'm as big a NASCAR fan as any avowed redneck.
Go #12!!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BUBBA
Lounge
2
Feb 13, 2007 04:50 PM
its840
Lounge
6
Nov 23, 2005 11:40 PM
harofreak00
General GM Chat
28
Aug 29, 2005 08:55 PM
captainmiller
Lounge
7
Apr 30, 2005 09:18 AM
zzzzzeke
Detailing & Appearance
6
Mar 17, 2004 02:06 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:08 AM.