which computer is faster?
11-21-2007, 07:08 PM
#12
Senior Member
Posts like a Camaro
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 1,137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Switch the video cards. I automatically assumed the processors had the top amount of FSB for their generation. If I were you, I would put all the parts into one computer. I own like 10 computers, and recently realized that having a bunch of computers is annoying. So now I have a really nice computer attached to my theatre, a decent one at my desk, and a laptop. All my other parts are just laying in a box.
11-22-2007, 04:09 PM
#16
PopaDopaDo
True Car Nut
Originally Posted by BLACK94SSEi
I think whats more important is the systems Front Side Bus. 
Amd running a slowed clocked processor 2.167Ghz and fsb 333.
Intel running Fast clocked processor 2.8Ghz and FSB 400 Min, 800 max. will definitely win the battle.
I've always used at leat 1 AMD pc and found that their processor claim is only accurate in certain applications. Most often I find their stock speed to be a better judge of performace for what I use them for. Currently I have an 3.4Ghz Athlon 64 and my main intel is a 2.6 Ghz Dual core so I can't judge fairly. My last AMD ( XP2200+) was routinly trounced by my 1.333Ghz Intel P3
Again, this would be for what I use pc for. Gaming mainly.
11-22-2007, 04:23 PM
#17
Senior Member
Posts like a Camaro
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 1,137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is more to the processor than the speeds. AMDs are a better processor design for certain applications because of the way it processes. It is more efficient because it spends less time on a single process than an Intel does, which makes the lack of speed negligible.
Compare a current AMD X2 at 2.8ghz with a Core 2 equivalent, and the AMD will run faster and cooler (imo, untested, but drawn from experience with both).
Compare a current AMD X2 at 2.8ghz with a Core 2 equivalent, and the AMD will run faster and cooler (imo, untested, but drawn from experience with both).
11-22-2007, 06:55 PM
#19
PopaDopaDo
True Car Nut
Originally Posted by chr0mius
Compare a current AMD X2 at 2.8ghz with a Core 2 equivalent, and the AMD will run faster and cooler (imo, untested, but drawn from experience with both).
11-23-2007, 07:24 PM
#20
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well, that test is cool
How about 729.6, It didnt run all of the tests though, so real results would be higher, but i didnt want to uninstall DX10 and go to DX9 (im on vista ultimate) C2D E6805, 2gb DDR2800, 8800GTS 640mb