Depends on which one...Berettastuff is having problems with post ****** and people fighting from time to time...Beretta net is REALLY strict..just depends...Beretta net woudl probably be the best choice if you actually wanted to learn something useful

No. The HO was pretty much used only in the GTZ'* ..I think the other was a 2.2 5 speed..not sure...but im pretty positive

I gotta respect cuz I sold one before (just the engine.) Netted myself a pretty $1200 from it.

if the quad 4 is the 2.3 liter then the 8?-91 skylarks had it as an option...my 2.5 said 4 tech on it...lol..the memories..i painted the Autobot logo on my air cleaner..lmao..

Sorry..Later

James

The Tech4 was not the same engine. It was a SOHC, not a DOHC.

I thought the Tech 4 was a pushrod engine???

But its definately a different engine. They have a LOT less power than the Quad 4'*. In 1990 the Tech 4 had 95hp IIRC whereas the HO Quad 4 had 180. In 91 the Tech 4 was still 95hp and the W41 version of the HO Quad 4 was available with 190hp....TWICE that of a Tech 4. And the Quad 4 is a 2.3L.

Shawn

Well it seems as though the drivetrain of this car has been maintained pretty well. It has 184,600 on it, so it has a bit of miles, but it runs VERY well and doesn't smoke or anything, and it isn't using any coolant either...knock on wood. (knew it was a common problem so I've been watching it) It has a small oil leak, but I haven't investigated where yet, but its really small so I'm not really worried. It sat for 5 months before I bought it an was only 3/4 quart low, so its not a big leak.

All I really need is to get 190k out of it and then I'll get rid of it in the spring. 5k should easily cover the winter for me, I don't drive that much.

Shawn

http://quad4forums.com/forums/

Been there, checked that out already. I appreciate the link though.

Shawn