Active fuel management
Wow, this thread is a blast from the past!
It is interesting to see what was said in 2018 and 2008 about AFM as it progressed through the ages.
Your AFM disabler won't cause any mechanical harm. AFM engines start in all-cylinder mode and often run in all-cylinder mode as they do their job. Your disabler is simply telling the PCM to never do any AFM stuff. If there was buildup of an issue or issues in your vehicle prior to your disabler, they may still pop up, but your disabler would likely extend the time before that happens by quite a bit.
It is interesting to see what was said in 2018 and 2008 about AFM as it progressed through the ages.
Your AFM disabler won't cause any mechanical harm. AFM engines start in all-cylinder mode and often run in all-cylinder mode as they do their job. Your disabler is simply telling the PCM to never do any AFM stuff. If there was buildup of an issue or issues in your vehicle prior to your disabler, they may still pop up, but your disabler would likely extend the time before that happens by quite a bit.
Yeah, definitely the safer way to go if you can afford it (or do it yourself) 
I still would love to see documented cases of AFM failures and AFM high durability compared to oil change intervals. Over the years, I've owned and seen many engines with a reputation for failures that have some relation to oil quality, and seen them have no oil issues well past 200,000 miles. Many of them come from that mid/late 20xx era where most of the big manufacturers started heavily pushing extended oil change intervals. Many owners push those intervals much further, and of course don't often talk about it. Are those the ones that are failing? Lots of speculation, seldom is there any real documentation, but then when a failure occurs, there is little or no mention of this factor . . . I believe often this is because it is not easily provable.

I still would love to see documented cases of AFM failures and AFM high durability compared to oil change intervals. Over the years, I've owned and seen many engines with a reputation for failures that have some relation to oil quality, and seen them have no oil issues well past 200,000 miles. Many of them come from that mid/late 20xx era where most of the big manufacturers started heavily pushing extended oil change intervals. Many owners push those intervals much further, and of course don't often talk about it. Are those the ones that are failing? Lots of speculation, seldom is there any real documentation, but then when a failure occurs, there is little or no mention of this factor . . . I believe often this is because it is not easily provable.
Documentation of oil changes and all services would be the proof in the pudding. Yes I did the work myself following Danny Johnson'* Garage video, although it didn't go quite as well as his did I got it done and works good. It'* rated as a 30 hr job times C125.00/hr. Had to buy a few tools and spent close to C4000.00 total on parts. Had to walk or pedal my bike for a mile or so to work for a month but still cheaper.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
2000SilverBullet
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
35
Apr 10, 2004 08:08 PM








