1990 GP ste Turbo mcclaren
#11
Senior Member
Posts like a Supercharger
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There was an absolutely mint TSTE on eBay a while back with about the same mileage that went for $4k, so I'd say $2,500 is decent. They look killer with the '94 - '96 white 5 spoke GP wheels. Insurance is pretty damn cheap on mine, though I'm 31 with 0 accidents or tickets on my record.
#12
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Holt, MI & Lima, OH
Posts: 3,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FWIW the car is not worth that IMO. In '04 I paid $1800 for mine with 69k on the clock. Mine also didn't need that much work. They also seem to need a lot of maintenance as well. You're not gonna buy this car and be able to not ever have to work on it. However, if you could get the car for under $2k you'll probably be ok.
They were only made in the Maroon or White, White ones being made 2-1 over the red ones. The best mod you can do tho as already mentioned is the white 94-96 5 spokes. I have maroon ones on my car and it made a HUGE difference. I also pay something like $36/mo for insurance on mine and I'm only 19 but I do have a clean record....
Also stock mine ran a 14.96 @ 91.79... With just a chip and horrible traction it ran the time in my sig. Never got to run my good setup at the track but it went 13.6 @ 100.xx on my gtech which is usually accurate to a few tenths from my observations.
In all honesty though, the best advice I could give you is to run, very quickly, and very far away from that car.
They were only made in the Maroon or White, White ones being made 2-1 over the red ones. The best mod you can do tho as already mentioned is the white 94-96 5 spokes. I have maroon ones on my car and it made a HUGE difference. I also pay something like $36/mo for insurance on mine and I'm only 19 but I do have a clean record....
Also stock mine ran a 14.96 @ 91.79... With just a chip and horrible traction it ran the time in my sig. Never got to run my good setup at the track but it went 13.6 @ 100.xx on my gtech which is usually accurate to a few tenths from my observations.
In all honesty though, the best advice I could give you is to run, very quickly, and very far away from that car.
#13
Senior Member
Posts like a Supercharger
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dbtk2
FWIW the car is not worth that IMO. In '04 I paid $1800 for mine with 69k on the clock. Mine also didn't need that much work.
Originally Posted by dbtk2
They also seem to need a lot of maintenance as well. You're not gonna buy this car and be able to not ever have to work on it.
#14
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Holt, MI & Lima, OH
Posts: 3,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RareGMFan
I'd agree with that, but in fairness, how many 17 year old cars do you not have to work on?
And none of them needed $1k brake master cylinders either....
#15
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere south of Ottawa with your girlfriend driving faster then you.
Posts: 3,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#16
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Holt, MI & Lima, OH
Posts: 3,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ReallyAGXP
you could have gotten dbtk2'* turbo lumina lol
That was definately the nicest turbo 3.1 car I had mainly because it didn't have any of the stupid problems. It has a good chip in it, and regular brakes, and all that. And for what I paid for it it was a very nice car....dont find many $700 cars like that.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbtk2
Your Ride: GM Pictures & Videos
21
01-26-2004 05:31 PM