What Needs To Be Done To Save GM
12-16-2005, 09:00 AM
#11
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Small, tactical strikes on competeing companies.
We start by harassing the supplies going into pruduction plants, at first introducing defective parts. This will make dependbillity and value of enemy products go down and force more people to switch to GM.
Then we start taking out their supplys completely, causing production numbers to further drop.
Sales will go down and they will be forced to sell out to GM.
Look, it'* not flawless, but it'* an idea. We can fine tune it.
We start by harassing the supplies going into pruduction plants, at first introducing defective parts. This will make dependbillity and value of enemy products go down and force more people to switch to GM.
Then we start taking out their supplys completely, causing production numbers to further drop.
Sales will go down and they will be forced to sell out to GM.
Look, it'* not flawless, but it'* an idea. We can fine tune it.
12-16-2005, 09:28 AM
#12
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jack
Small, tactical strikes on competeing companies.
We start by harassing the supplies going into pruduction plants, at first introducing defective parts. This will make dependbillity and value of enemy products go down and force more people to switch to GM.
Then we start taking out their supplys completely, causing production numbers to further drop.
Sales will go down and they will be forced to sell out to GM.
Look, it'* not flawless, but it'* an idea. We can fine tune it.
We start by harassing the supplies going into pruduction plants, at first introducing defective parts. This will make dependbillity and value of enemy products go down and force more people to switch to GM.
Then we start taking out their supplys completely, causing production numbers to further drop.
Sales will go down and they will be forced to sell out to GM.
Look, it'* not flawless, but it'* an idea. We can fine tune it.
12-16-2005, 09:34 AM
#13
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by repinS
Originally Posted by Jack
Small, tactical strikes on competeing companies.
We start by harassing the supplies going into pruduction plants, at first introducing defective parts. This will make dependbillity and value of enemy products go down and force more people to switch to GM.
Then we start taking out their supplys completely, causing production numbers to further drop.
Sales will go down and they will be forced to sell out to GM.
Look, it'* not flawless, but it'* an idea. We can fine tune it.
We start by harassing the supplies going into pruduction plants, at first introducing defective parts. This will make dependbillity and value of enemy products go down and force more people to switch to GM.
Then we start taking out their supplys completely, causing production numbers to further drop.
Sales will go down and they will be forced to sell out to GM.
Look, it'* not flawless, but it'* an idea. We can fine tune it.
... 
Maybe if we took some of the heat off GM they'd be able to concentrate on making their products better.
12-16-2005, 09:36 AM
#14
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: August 07 COTM....NEBF '06, CEBF '06 OHMM '06 ONBF '07 CEBF '07
Posts: 4,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh come on! No car is too small for a V8! But I can understand where you're coming from. Plus a turbo 4 is coming out anyway for that car. Colbalt, you're probably right, a V6 would be too much. I think a turbo 4 would be best (I agree with you).
Oh, a AWD is a must. That is one of the first things that needs to be done. And I really like the new Legacy GT with the 250hp turbo H4.
I was just using the SSEi as an example, I don't want GM to use that nomenclature, just a visual example that'* all.
Oh, a AWD is a must. That is one of the first things that needs to be done. And I really like the new Legacy GT with the 250hp turbo H4.
I was just using the SSEi as an example, I don't want GM to use that nomenclature, just a visual example that'* all.
12-16-2005, 09:38 AM
#15
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Originally Posted by repinS
Originally Posted by Jack
Small, tactical strikes on competeing companies.
We start by harassing the supplies going into pruduction plants, at first introducing defective parts. This will make dependbillity and value of enemy products go down and force more people to switch to GM.
Then we start taking out their supplys completely, causing production numbers to further drop.
Sales will go down and they will be forced to sell out to GM.
Look, it'* not flawless, but it'* an idea. We can fine tune it.
We start by harassing the supplies going into pruduction plants, at first introducing defective parts. This will make dependbillity and value of enemy products go down and force more people to switch to GM.
Then we start taking out their supplys completely, causing production numbers to further drop.
Sales will go down and they will be forced to sell out to GM.
Look, it'* not flawless, but it'* an idea. We can fine tune it.
And you are also right. Protectionism and virtual market dominance is one of the reasons GM (and Ford) are in the soup today. Lack of real competition tends to breed complacency and incompetence.
12-16-2005, 10:56 AM
#17
Originally Posted by Jack
Bring back Camaro and Firebird in a kick A$$ styling with retro looks that pay honor to the 67-69 1st gen models.And the power to back it up.
http://messageboard.firehawk.org/viewtopic.php?t=6255
12-16-2005, 11:31 AM
#18
Here are some concept pics of the 2009 Camaro, too...
http://www.mifbody.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=835
http://www.mifbody.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=835
12-16-2005, 12:07 PM
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by ga93sle
They just need to quit putting things that nobody needs, on EVERY CAR. If you want a DVD player, order it. If you want 4x4, order it. Make it where you order the cars exactly how you want them, and have a barebones base truck. The Elbert County government owns a bunch of base model Silverados, and these things have cd players. I was looking for a Chevy Tahoe one time, and I could not find one with 4x4, no dvd player, cloth interior, etc. I knew exactly how I wanted it, and that'* how I was gonna buy one, no other way, there went one of their customers. GM has never directly made a penny off of me. That would have been my first new car, and the way it looks, I'll never be able to buy a new GM car or truck, so they'll never make a penny off of me. Just my opinion, I could be wrong.
Wondered what GM was coming to.... Still wondering
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
12-16-2005, 12:10 PM
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Puddy46
Make the new platforms be able to accept AWD configurations!. That way you're not concerned with the half of the population that deals with snow shy away from RWD vehicles, and those in warmer climates frown upon FWD set-ups.
Look at Subaru. Racing scene: accepted. Foul weather set: love 'em. Me: want one (Legacy GT at least)
And oh yeah, stop this crap:
Badge engineering didn't work the first time, won't work again....
Look at Subaru. Racing scene: accepted. Foul weather set: love 'em. Me: want one (Legacy GT at least)
And oh yeah, stop this crap:
Badge engineering didn't work the first time, won't work again....
But I'm not so sure about that new Design... icky
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote