General GM Chat When starting new posts, please specify YEAR, MAKE, MODEL, ENGINE type, and whatever modifications you have made. Chat about all things GM (and related cars). Off-topic stuff should be in the Lounge, and all Model specific mechanical problems should be posted in the proper forum.

Test drove 07 Impala SS

Old Jun 5, 2011 | 01:11 PM
  #1  
flyballdog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a Supercharger
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: Tweed Ontario Canada
flyballdog is on a distinguished road
Default Test drove 07 Impala SS

My wife is looking to move on up from her 2000 Buick Century so we have been out lot hopping driving about 30 used cars. They range from the Pontiac: Wave, Vibe and Torrent. Chev Cobalt, Malibu and Impalla. Also drove some Kia, Hyundai, assorted Fords such as Focus, Fussion.
The one I liked the most was out of her price range was a 2007 Impalla SS. That car is fast with a 5.3 V8. Had a blast driving it, my wife loved the power it had as we test drove ot for over 2 hours. ( I know the dealer). Then we drove a 2007 Impala LS with only 19,000 kms (under 12,000 miles) that we can get for $10,000. This one is like brand new still and came from an older couple. I will find out tomorrow if she decides on this one but am really hopeing she goes the extra $5,000 and gets the SS.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2011 | 01:19 PM
  #2  
sawgunner's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 7,122
Likes: 0
From: Dover, NH
sawgunner is on a distinguished road
Default

the imp SS is nice if you want one that is still pretty quick but less on the budget find a LT with the 3.9L in it.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2011 | 01:19 PM
  #3  
raptor660's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,964
Likes: 2
From: Eaton Rapids MI
raptor660 is on a distinguished road
Default

that would be a fun DD!
We have been having an ongoing dispute at work: Who'* car is faster? Dukes 2009 Impala SS (5.3) or Thomas'* 2009 300C (5.7 Hemi)
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2011 | 01:29 PM
  #4  
flyballdog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a Supercharger
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: Tweed Ontario Canada
flyballdog is on a distinguished road
Default

I did not see any with the 3.9, the majority was either 3.4 or 3.5.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2011 | 01:31 PM
  #5  
sawgunner's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 7,122
Likes: 0
From: Dover, NH
sawgunner is on a distinguished road
Default

the 3.5L is ok but the 3.9L and some 5.3L'* have the active fuel management on them that shuts down half the motor to save fuel while cruising. that is why i wanted the one i got. i do a lot of traveling so anyway to cut corners on fuel consumption was a huge factor in the purchase
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2011 | 01:41 PM
  #6  
Danthurs's Avatar
Retired Senior Admin

Expert Gearhead
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 29,661
Likes: 43
From: Sheboygan Wisconsin
Danthurs is a name known to allDanthurs is a name known to allDanthurs is a name known to allDanthurs is a name known to allDanthurs is a name known to allDanthurs is a name known to all
Default

Those are very nice cars. Good luck.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2011 | 01:42 PM
  #7  
2k2cse's Avatar
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 19
From: Newfoundland, Canada
2k2cse has a spectacular aura about2k2cse has a spectacular aura about
Default

The Impalas are nice cars. My parents have a 2009 LS they bought as a demo, in november 09, with only 10,000 kms on it. It has about 100,000 more on it now. Other than needing a 4 wheel alignment and a few small things that were covered under warrany, its been a good car. I haven't been in an SS, but one did drive past me one day when I was walking to school.. amazing sound
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2011 | 08:38 PM
  #8  
jwfirebird's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,616
Likes: 594
From: western,ny state
jwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond reputejwfirebird has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Originally Posted by sawgunner
the 3.5L is ok but the 3.9L and some 5.3L'* have the active fuel management on them that shuts down half the motor to save fuel while cruising. that is why i wanted the one i got. i do a lot of traveling so anyway to cut corners on fuel consumption was a huge factor in the purchase
the 3.5'* like my 3400 will run well into the 30'* without afm. real world highway not epa listing that really isnt reliable.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2011 | 09:26 PM
  #9  
sawgunner's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 7,122
Likes: 0
From: Dover, NH
sawgunner is on a distinguished road
Default

that is correct however as long as you don't run ethanol. if you do you will see a nast drop in fuel economy
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2011 | 04:39 AM
  #10  
MouSe's Avatar
BANNED
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,989
Likes: 4
From: Usa
MouSe is on a distinguished road
Default

AFM ain't all it'* cracked up to be. I had it in both my Avalanche(07 LT) and my Monte Carlo(06 SS) and the difference between active and in-active was negligible.

Also be glad you got an 08, my moms 07 LTZ with the 3.9 has had a few problems in it. One being related to the AFM ahaha.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:37 PM.