I'm All MAF'd out
#22
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK, the idea of a clogged Catalytic converter made all the sense in the world. My MAF has been replaced, the wiring and fuses all checked, so I am convinced that is NOT the problem. But air flow is the problem. After reading this and talking to some colleagues, I tried this. I removed the pre-cat oxygen sensor.....the only one.....and tried running the car with that as a temporary exhaust bypass......low and behold, the car ran, up to and including highway speeds (before, I couldn't even drive it up my driveway and if it was operating temp, couldn't even restart it).
So it seems that this test proved the cat flow COULD be the problem. Still getting a MAF error, but if the CAT is clogged, maybe the flow still isn't good enough???
What are thoughts on this trial method? Next question is, should I replace the cat or simply remove (hey, I live in the sticks).
So it seems that this test proved the cat flow COULD be the problem. Still getting a MAF error, but if the CAT is clogged, maybe the flow still isn't good enough???
What are thoughts on this trial method? Next question is, should I replace the cat or simply remove (hey, I live in the sticks).
#24
Administratus Emeritus
Certified Car Nut
Sometimes you can't see the MAF tree cause of the forest. Makes sense to me given everything you've done and the obvious improvement. Low air flow with throttle other than idle can throw a MAF fault. It'* reading what the ECM decides isnt right given the TPS setting. And hasn't a clue you have an obsruction. Most converters have many "tube'*" and when they clog it'* all at the same time. I'd bet the improvement of removing the O2 sensor will turn into a fix upon removing the cat. If you live in an area that doesn't have tight inspection laws or emissions testing, why bother. Of course that'* not "advice" , but what I personally would do. I'd rather be polictically incorrect than lie.
#27
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yanked out the cat and put a straight pipe in its place for "testing purposes". Car is now drivable, but I am still getting that darn MAF sensor code.
Something somebody warned me about driving without the cat and that is running too lean? I know what running lean can do to an engine, but since this car has the O2 sensor BEFORE the cat (in exhaust maniford), would the ECM still run a lean fuel mixture?
Something somebody warned me about driving without the cat and that is running too lean? I know what running lean can do to an engine, but since this car has the O2 sensor BEFORE the cat (in exhaust maniford), would the ECM still run a lean fuel mixture?
#28
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some MAF cars have a burn off relay, but I didn't find one for your car on any auto parts sites.
#29
Retired Senior Admin
Expert Gearhead
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sheboygan Wisconsin
Posts: 29,661
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes
on
24 Posts
You said you changed the MAF and same problem? If so, inspect teh plug. Had a car a while back that had a damaged plug causing MAF codes. Was a loose connecting on the wire. Crimped it down and problem was gone.
#30
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh, yeah, I thought that might have been the problem early on so I replaced the pigtail (soldered the new one on). Got good ground and 12 volts with ignition on.....didn't know what to look for on the yellow wire, but if the ground and hot are good, assuming the yellow (to ECM) is good as well.