General GM Chat When starting new posts, please specify YEAR, MAKE, MODEL, ENGINE type, and whatever modifications you have made. Chat about all things GM (and related cars). Off-topic stuff should be in the Lounge, and all Model specific mechanical problems should be posted in the proper forum.

180 degree thermostat question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 05:26 PM
  #1  
95LHS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
95LHS is on a distinguished road
Default 180 degree thermostat question

So, one thing I've noticed while reading around on this forum is that there'* an overwhelming consensus that a colder-than-stock thermostat will improve performance, wear characteristics, etc. Most opt for the 180 degree version and some have even gone as low as 160.

I propose the following: colder thermostats may lower performance and increase wear.

Now, this is a delicate subject...there are many variables to consider. But:

While colder air means more power, hotter combustion chamber temperatures mean better thermal efficiency and more power produced (less energy goes into heat loss).

Hotter temperatures decrease the life of engine oil...but also decrease engine wear when oil life isn't taken into account (think about cold starts).



Of course, higher horsepower engines may need a lower temperature 'stat to keep from overheating, so this is aimed at stock N/A cars.

Thoughts?
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 05:46 PM
  #2  
agrazela's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
agrazela is on a distinguished road
Default

I went to a 180 T-stat on my 1998 n/a L36 primarily to do everything possible to reduce operating temperatures and prevent UIM melting, not for any performance gains.

Even if this "mod" has the potential to shorten engine life (which I highly doubt), I expect the engine will still outlast the transmission by a large margin.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 05:56 PM
  #3  
Hans's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,545
Likes: 1
From: Twin Falls, Idaho
Hans is on a distinguished road
Default

I'm a bit torn on the topic as to whether or not a 180 will keep the UIM from having issues, this is caused by the EGR tube, lower exhaust temps would prevent this from happening but theres not an easy way to accomplish this.

As far as intake gaskets failing, I'm 100% convinced that a 180 will help prevent the gaskets from dying as quick.

I will argue that a 180* will NOT lose fuel economy. on a 300 mile trip I used 9.9 gallons on the SSEi and I also had a 32mpg FLAT highway trip on my old L27 3800 powered Olds 88.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 07:40 PM
  #4  
clm2112's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: BonnevilleHell
clm2112 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: 180 degree thermostat question

Originally Posted by 95LHS
I propose the following: colder thermostats may lower performance and increase wear.
Sorry, but you would be mistaken.

The only reason the auto makers go to higher temp t-stats is for emissions purposes. It has no effect on wear and hurts the engines potential power output. In stock trim, the engine is running a bit on the lean side with a higher than optimal combustion chamber temp. This keeps the exhaust gas temps up so the catalytic converter can function better. EGR is used to cool down the combustion chamber if things get out of hand faster than the radiator can knock the temp back down to the 195 range.

You didn't start seeing 195 T-stats until the introduction of unleaded gasoline and catalytic converters. Before then, engine temps in the 160 to 180 range were the norm.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 09:10 PM
  #5  
BillBoost37's Avatar
DINOSAURUS BOOSTUS

Expert Gearhead
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 41,391
Likes: 30
From: Enfield, CT
BillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Well put Curt.. couldn't have said it better myself.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 09:47 PM
  #6  
willwren's Avatar
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 11
Likes: 13
willwren is on a distinguished road
Default

LHS, I get 32mpg in the Zilla at 70mph on the freeway with a 160 degree thermostat. I think it'* doing just fine.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2007 | 09:07 AM
  #7  
Rogue's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,127
Likes: 1
From: Westerville, Ohio 2000 Black SSEi
Rogue is on a distinguished road
Default

I have a 160 T-stat and my mileage sucks.... (20mpg)


although it could be the gearing....

or the power....

or the fact that i eat tires for breakfast stop light to stop light....


nope I think its the thermostat...
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2007 | 12:09 PM
  #8  
bill buttermore's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,066
Likes: 10
From: Ames, Iowa
bill buttermore is on a distinguished road
Default

Another benefit of the lower temperature thermostat that is often overlooked - cooler transmission temperatures. Since the transmission fluid is cooled in the radiator, a cooler running radiator keeps the transmission fluid cooler. The 4T60E does not like heat - it is the number 1 cause of transmission failures.

My engineering friends have told me, (and I believe them) that higher operating engine temperatures should produce better efficiencies. But theory and practice are two different things, and engine oil and transmission fluid at 180 work better and last longer than they do at 200.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2007 | 01:29 PM
  #9  
bonnie94ssei's Avatar
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,308
Likes: 2
bonnie94ssei is on a distinguished road
Default

Hotter temperatures decrease the life of engine oil...but also decrease engine wear when oil life isn't taken into account (think about cold starts).
Are you saying that hotter temps due to a 195 stat will thin the oil quicker over time and allow for more protection on cold starts?

I wouldn't say that'* reason to keep a 195. If you wanted more protection at cold starts, use 5W as opposed to 10W (especially in winter), and/or switch to synthetic oil, and keep the 180 in for more protection while you are driving, when you need the stat most.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2007 | 02:12 PM
  #10  
nicklikesmilk's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
From: Whitewater, Wisconsin
nicklikesmilk is on a distinguished road
Default

i really doubt 15 degrees F will make a huge difference in fuel economy or life of the engine itself, other than helping prevent the intake gasket failures etc...
Originally Posted by bill buttermore
Since the transmission fluid is cooled in the radiator, a cooler running radiator keeps the transmission fluid cooler. The 4T60E does not like heat - it is the number 1 cause of transmission failures.
.
and that also is very true, so i think it is worth it to sacrifice a little bit of possible fuel economy and emissions control to prevent failure of those vital parts
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:14 PM.