Forced Induction All questions and problems regarding Superchargers, Turbos, NOS, ZEX, intercoolers, water injection, etc.

Larger Tensioner vs Smaller Belts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-12-2005, 08:48 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Thread Starter
 
Mortehl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Home Sweet Home in New York
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mortehl is on a distinguished road
Default Larger Tensioner vs Smaller Belts

I've noticed that some people use a larger tensioner pulley while others use a smaller belt when adding a smaller SC pulley. Beyond the fact that the larger tension pulley is cheaper, are there any other reasons to take one approach versus the other?
Old 12-12-2005, 08:51 PM
  #2  
BANNED
 
harofreak00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Purgatory
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
harofreak00 is on a distinguished road
Default

i think you get more belt wrap on the SC one way of the other... not sure which way though...

i had both options in front of me.. and i did the belt
Old 12-12-2005, 08:58 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Thread Starter
 
Mortehl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Home Sweet Home in New York
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mortehl is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by harofreak00
i think you get more belt wrap on the SC one way of the other... not sure which way though...

i had both options in front of me.. and i did the belt
Same here. I'm trying to make a choice which way to go.
Old 12-12-2005, 09:24 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
TrueWildMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Salina, KS
Posts: 5,246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TrueWildMan is on a distinguished road
Default

More belt wrap with the bigger tensioner.

Theory is, it allows less slip.
Old 12-12-2005, 09:46 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Thread Starter
 
Mortehl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Home Sweet Home in New York
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mortehl is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by TrueWildMan
More belt wrap with the bigger tensioner.

Theory is, it allows less slip.
Well that settles it for me then.
Old 12-12-2005, 10:36 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
 
willwren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
willwren is on a distinguished road
Default

S2? Not as critical.

S1 92/93 L67 CRITICAL for an oversized tensioner pulley.
S1 94/95 L67 STRONGLY suggested for the oversized pulley.

By belt path design, the S1 is marginal to begin with. The smaller pulley'* compound the problem.
Old 12-12-2005, 11:22 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
 
llBlazin_llLo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bolingbrook, IL Location: Clarkston, MI
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
llBlazin_llLo is on a distinguished road
Default

You best bet is on a Series 1 is the oversized tensioner pulley also get a NAPA Gates belt and you will NEVER have to think about belt slip again.

The only thing that an OEM tensioner pulley and smaller belt has to offer is less rotating mass. But that mass you can't even measure.

I run a smaller tensioner pulley and a belt about half the lenght (51") of a stock belt and have more belt wrap then any Series 1 out their but that is a little custom.
Old 12-21-2005, 06:19 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
Posts like a Northstar
 
Jason1351's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jason1351 is on a distinguished road
Default

S2? Not as critical

Sorry Will, gotta correct ya on that. Got a smaller */C pully and deffinetly use smaller belt. Larger pully causes belt rub very badly, specially under WOT.
Old 12-21-2005, 06:38 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
OLBlueEyesBonne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sauk Centre, MN
Posts: 5,459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OLBlueEyesBonne is on a distinguished road
Default

I did both a larger tensioner pulley and a smaller belt and Sunday when I opened the hood I found A LOT of rubber duston the SC snout that wasn't there two weeks earlier when I put the new belt on. :(

Gonna order a Gatorback and see if that helps. Otherwise I'm not sure what to do.
Old 12-21-2005, 08:51 PM
  #10  
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
 
willwren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
willwren is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by Jason1351
S2? Not as critical

Sorry Will, gotta correct ya on that. Got a smaller */C pully and deffinetly use smaller belt. Larger pully causes belt rub very badly, specially under WOT.
Jason, you're misreading my reply. I said the oversized tensioner pulley is not as critically needed for a S2. It'* REQUIRED for a S1 92/93, and STRONGLY suggested for a 94/95.

You can go either oversized idler or smaller belt with a smaller SC pulley. S1 really has no choice.

FYI Jason, many S2 cars here are running the oversized idler with no problems whatsoever, including hundreds of GTP'* with the L67 as well.


Quick Reply: Larger Tensioner vs Smaller Belts



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:22 PM.