Forced Induction All questions and problems regarding Superchargers, Turbos, NOS, ZEX, intercoolers, water injection, etc.

Cleaning rotors in supercharger?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 01:49 AM
  #1  
zecc81's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a 4 Banger
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
zecc81 is on a distinguished road
Default Cleaning rotors in supercharger?

I just took my supercharger off and took a look at the rotors through the hole in the bottom where it connects to the intake manifold....and they are absolutely covered in a think layer of soot, or some black, dried oil substance. Should these be cleaned while I have it off?
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 06:20 AM
  #2  
Danthurs's Avatar
Retired Senior Admin

Expert Gearhead
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 29,661
Likes: 43
From: Sheboygan Wisconsin
Danthurs is a name known to allDanthurs is a name known to allDanthurs is a name known to allDanthurs is a name known to allDanthurs is a name known to allDanthurs is a name known to all
Default

No, do not clean that off. That'* the coating and should be there.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 09:36 AM
  #3  
Toddster's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 0
Likes: 2
Toddster is on a distinguished road
Default

X2

Clean that off and your SC'r is screwed!
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 12:45 PM
  #4  
Purplehazeir's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,979
Likes: 2
From: Arlington, WA
Purplehazeir is on a distinguished road
Default

X3

No touchy the rotors.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 03:21 PM
  #5  
zecc81's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a 4 Banger
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
zecc81 is on a distinguished road
Default

Good to know, thanks. But the reason I ask is half of it is coming off and I can see bear metal. Does it affect performance in any way?

Last edited by zecc81; Aug 23, 2009 at 03:40 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 11:16 PM
  #6  
Danthurs's Avatar
Retired Senior Admin

Expert Gearhead
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 29,661
Likes: 43
From: Sheboygan Wisconsin
Danthurs is a name known to allDanthurs is a name known to allDanthurs is a name known to allDanthurs is a name known to allDanthurs is a name known to allDanthurs is a name known to all
Default

To a point, it allows a gap between the rotors so it'* less efficient.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2009 | 09:33 AM
  #7  
BillBoost37's Avatar
DINOSAURUS BOOSTUS

Expert Gearhead
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 41,391
Likes: 30
From: Enfield, CT
BillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of light
Default

The SC on the OP'* 92 was the first version of the M62. This version came with uncoated rotors. I am in agreement about not cleaning the rotors as it would increase the tolerances between the rotors and make the SC less efficient.

92-93 M62 uncoated rotors
94-95 M62 coated rotors
96+ M90 coated rotors.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2009 | 03:25 PM
  #8  
zecc81's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a 4 Banger
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
zecc81 is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by BillBoost37
The SC on the OP'* 92 was the first version of the M62. This version came with uncoated rotors. I am in agreement about not cleaning the rotors as it would increase the tolerances between the rotors and make the SC less efficient.

92-93 M62 uncoated rotors
94-95 M62 coated rotors
96+ M90 coated rotors.
Ok now your confusing me. If my year of m62 shouldn't have a coating, then why is everyone saying don't clean them, if whatever is on them isn't even supposed to be there. There is definitely a teflon-type coating on the rotors, but a lot of it has worn off (especially in the middle) and the bear metal of the rotors is exposed. Here are some pictures.






Last edited by zecc81; Aug 24, 2009 at 03:36 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2009 | 06:38 AM
  #9  
BillBoost37's Avatar
DINOSAURUS BOOSTUS

Expert Gearhead
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 41,391
Likes: 30
From: Enfield, CT
BillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Your year came with a non-coated rotor according to all the facts and SC'* I've ever seen from your year. Being that the casing itself is slightly different, unless your motor was swapped, the charger shouldn't have coating on the rotors.

Everyone else is telling you they have coating, because all the superchargers had coating except 92 and 93. Most folks don't have a lot of experience with the 92 and 93 chargers. The other thing I'm saying is things happen, engines get swapped and in general terms your rotors shouldn't be coated.

Clearly though... don't ever clean rotors. It'* a bad idea. First off you will clean the grease out of the needle bearings that the rotors rely on to spin. Secondly you'll see all the coating come off like I did.
Name:  P1010462.jpg
Views: 2903
Size:  86.1 KB

Name:  P1010463.jpg
Views: 2559
Size:  201.6 KB

Name:  Picture035.jpg
Views: 2725
Size:  45.8 KB

At the time the average supercharger for my car was costing over $500 used from friends. It was a bad day.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2009 | 02:35 PM
  #10  
zecc81's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a 4 Banger
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
zecc81 is on a distinguished road
Default

I only bought this car a year ago, so I don't have too much history on it, but it definitely seems something has been swapped if I have coated rotors, thanks for the info.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:08 PM.