Why Only 275 Horsepower?
05-26-2004, 11:42 PM
#11
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sauk Centre, MN
Posts: 5,459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BadSSEi
I just brought home a new GPX and I have two comments:
1) Damn, is this thing SLOW!
2) Other than the above problem, this is one of the nicest cars I've ever ridden in, driven or seen.
Maybe I'll have to focus a little on the first issue...
Scott
1) Damn, is this thing SLOW!
2) Other than the above problem, this is one of the nicest cars I've ever ridden in, driven or seen.
Maybe I'll have to focus a little on the first issue...
Scott
BTW, what color and any clues on what the mods list will be looking like?
Probably hard to guess the mods yet, until you get to know the N* like the L67.
Anyhow, be sure to keep us updated on what our speed-demon GXP is progressing.
05-27-2004, 08:27 AM
#13
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Westerville, Ohio 2000 Black SSEi
Posts: 6,127
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by BadSSEi
I just brought home a new GPX and I have two comments:
1) Damn, is this thing SLOW!
2) Other than the above problem, this is one of the nicest cars I've ever ridden in, driven or seen.
Maybe I'll have to focus a little on the first issue...
Scott
1) Damn, is this thing SLOW!
2) Other than the above problem, this is one of the nicest cars I've ever ridden in, driven or seen.
Maybe I'll have to focus a little on the first issue...
Scott
05-27-2004, 04:12 PM
#14
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Montréal, QC
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BadSSEi
I just brought home a new GPX and I have two comments:
1) Damn, is this thing SLOW!
2) Other than the above problem, this is one of the nicest cars I've ever ridden in, driven or seen.
Maybe I'll have to focus a little on the first issue...
Scott
1) Damn, is this thing SLOW!
2) Other than the above problem, this is one of the nicest cars I've ever ridden in, driven or seen.
Maybe I'll have to focus a little on the first issue...
Scott
Maybe you should forget #1 Scott and figure out where the cruise control is
Cheers,
05-27-2004, 07:20 PM
#16
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bloomington-Normal, IL 1997 SE
Posts: 3,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i guess going from your SSei to almost anything would be slow. I bet to you my car would feel like its barely moving all the time
05-27-2004, 10:54 PM
#17
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
BadGXP... Hrm, you sure you wanna race out a nice car like that? 
j/k....
You better be at the national meet in july, and you better have that sucker running 12'*
Other then that, congrats, you've earned it working hard for the 3800 community, and now you have a whole new bag of worms...
j/k....You better be at the national meet in july, and you better have that sucker running 12'*
Other then that, congrats, you've earned it working hard for the 3800 community, and now you have a whole new bag of worms...
05-27-2004, 10:59 PM
#18
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Purgatory
Posts: 6,313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Getting back to the differences in the two motors.
After a bit of digging the cylinder heads are diff. the caddy gets 2 (1.425in) intake valves same as the gxp but the caddy gets 2 (1.42 in) exhaust valves while the gxp only gets 2 (1.102 in) exhaust valves.
Also cadilac has a cam shaft posistion actuator system that allows the ecm to adjust cam shaft timming of all 4 cams while the engine is running, not the gxp.
I would think these two facts might add up to the 25hp drop in the gxp?
After a bit of digging the cylinder heads are diff. the caddy gets 2 (1.425in) intake valves same as the gxp but the caddy gets 2 (1.42 in) exhaust valves while the gxp only gets 2 (1.102 in) exhaust valves.
Also cadilac has a cam shaft posistion actuator system that allows the ecm to adjust cam shaft timming of all 4 cams while the engine is running, not the gxp.
I would think these two facts might add up to the 25hp drop in the gxp?
05-29-2004, 12:04 PM
#20
Senior Member
Posts like a Northstar
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PontiacDad
Getting back to the differences in the two motors.
After a bit of digging the cylinder heads are diff. the caddy gets 2 (1.425in) intake valves same as the gxp but the caddy gets 2 (1.42 in) exhaust valves while the gxp only gets 2 (1.102 in) exhaust valves.
Also cadilac has a cam shaft posistion actuator system that allows the ecm to adjust cam shaft timming of all 4 cams while the engine is running, not the gxp.
I would think these two facts might add up to the 25hp drop in the gxp?
After a bit of digging the cylinder heads are diff. the caddy gets 2 (1.425in) intake valves same as the gxp but the caddy gets 2 (1.42 in) exhaust valves while the gxp only gets 2 (1.102 in) exhaust valves.
Also cadilac has a cam shaft posistion actuator system that allows the ecm to adjust cam shaft timming of all 4 cams while the engine is running, not the gxp.
I would think these two facts might add up to the 25hp drop in the gxp?