SC GXP vs V8 GXP - GM Forum - Buick, Cadillac, Olds, GMC & Pontiac chat

Bonneville GXP/ Northstar Powered Cars Discuss your Bonneville GXP and/or any other Northstar powered Olds or Cadillac... Including the 3.5L Twin Cam V6 (Short Star ) 4.0L and 4.6L Northstar V8's. Please use General Chat for non-mechanical issues, and Performance and Brainstorming for improvements.

SC GXP vs V8 GXP

Reply

 
 
 
Old 04-29-2004, 01:52 AM
  #1  
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 79
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
bigd is on a distinguished road
Default SC GXP vs V8 GXP

I just wanted to see what everyone thought. Remember the SC GXP w/270hp and Corsa cat back exhaust, stronger SC and K&N air filter? I was really anticipating that one when I first saw it on the pontiac.com and on the first auto show coverage of it. The V8 powere is cool, but I think the SC V6 hooked up would've been better overal because of gas mileage and that cool SC boost and sound. What do you all think?
bigd is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2004, 10:27 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
Expert Gearhead
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mississauga, Ontario
Posts: 20,893
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Jim W is on a distinguished road
Default

For the last 6 years GM has received a lot of flak for its 'antiquated" 3800 (now keep yer pants on BC....I'm reciting car mags and critics, not my own personal opinion ). It was time for the Bonneville to go back to a V8. Right now the Northstar is a well proven engine with a lot of power.

DOHC is the current trend in cars now. Most buyers are going for that higher speed performance as opposed to that smoke em off the line power. Think Nissan etc.

This will hopefully open up a wider aftermarket scene for drivers that are fortunate to have a V8 in front of em.

Its also time for the Bonneville to go back to RWD

*edit* and if you want whine...I suppose you need to hear a V8 at 5500 RPM...it whines...no...it screams
Jim W is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2004, 11:34 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 409
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
parallelcircuits is on a distinguished road
Default

The V8 powere is cool, but I think the SC V6 hooked up would've been better overal because of gas mileage and that cool SC boost and sound. What do you all think?
The thing about the gas mileage is that the V8 doesn't have to use High Octane it likes 87 grade. When you think about $0.20 a gallon difference in price the better gas mileage isn't that much better.
parallelcircuits is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2004, 11:53 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
Expert Gearhead
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mississauga, Ontario
Posts: 20,893
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Jim W is on a distinguished road
Default

Good point, however my car needs premium fuel. Dunno if thats Aurora V8 specifc as opposed to its Northstar cousin....but I thought aluminum blocks need at least 90 octane.

Regardless on the hwy I get 800 km out of a 70L (20G) tank
Jim W is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2004, 12:09 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,928
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
BonneMeMN is on a distinguished road
Default

Block material doesn't specify octane rating at all. Most aluminum blocks have many "high tech" things like higher compression, advanced timing controls etc, that require higher octane levels.

You also have a hot engine, so anything to help detonation
BonneMeMN is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2004, 12:17 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
SSEi95 is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by Jim W
Its also time for the Bonneville to go back to RWD
Why does everyone keep saying RWD????

isn't the 4t80 a FWD tranny?

Specs:
http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/frame...ar.mv&num=1793

And which way is the engine mounted:
SSEi95 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2004, 12:31 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Expert Gearhead
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mississauga, Ontario
Posts: 20,893
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Jim W is on a distinguished road
Default

Block material doesn't specify octane rating at all. Most aluminum blocks have many "high tech" things like higher compression, advanced timing controls etc, that require higher octane levels
Yes, exactly what I was implying, with a compression ratio of 10.3:1 (or 10.5:1, I dont recall) in the 95-99 Aurora it needs higher octane gas. I dont think the GXP has that high compression ratio. Lower octane may suffice.

Gordy, obviously the 4T80 would have to go if the Bonneville went rear wheel drive, but with all the Stabiltrak technology and weight distribution in new cars, RWD would be a wonderful performance addtion to any new Bonneville and yet maintain the control and stability of an FWD car.
Jim W is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2004, 12:49 PM
  #8  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
SSEi95 is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by Jim W
Gordy, obviously the 4T80 would have to go if the Bonneville went rear wheel drive, but with all the Stabiltrak technology and weight distribution in new cars, RWD would be a wonderful performance addtion to any new Bonneville and yet maintain the control and stability of an FWD car.
I have just seen it posted thru here a few times that the GXP will be RWD. I just wanted to make sure that everyone knew that it wasn't.
SSEi95 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2004, 12:55 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
Expert Gearhead
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mississauga, Ontario
Posts: 20,893
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Jim W is on a distinguished road
Default

Yes, unfortunately its not I think the 05 Bonneville may be...to bad its discontinued here
Jim W is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2004, 12:21 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
Posts like a Northstar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 560
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
mikey is on a distinguished road
Default

up till 99 all nothstars needed prememium. the 2000'* have a SLIGHTLY lower compression ratio, but a re-designed combustion chamber is the biggest reason.

the reason for the northstar/4t80e combo is simple. its a luxury car, needs a luxury powertrain. you CANNOT feel the shifts on a 4t80e, its super smooth. the whole powerband is smooth, its a smooth setup. the l67 isn't as smooth. plus the extra cost is justified in customers minds because it has a v8, sounds dumb, but it sounds better to people
mikey is offline  
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
marauder307
General GM Chat
3
06-05-2007 11:45 AM
Grimm
General GM Chat
5
11-23-2006 03:34 PM
bonnie94ssei
Lounge
26
05-28-2006 07:00 PM
Mortehl
Your Ride: GM Pictures & Videos
41
05-17-2006 03:11 PM
carlmorrell
General GM Chat
21
02-19-2006 08:29 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: SC GXP vs V8 GXP


Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.