1992-1999 Series I L27 (1992-1994 SE,SLE, SSE) & Series II L36 (1995-1999 SE, SSE, SLE) and common problems for the Series I and II L67 (all supercharged models 92-99) Including Olds 88's, Olds LSS's and Buick Lesabres Please use General Chat for non-mechanical issues, and Performance and Brainstorming for improvements.

Oil treatments

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 3, 2003 | 04:06 PM
  #1  
Mayhem_3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a 4 Banger
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Sioux Falls, South Dakota
Mayhem_3 is on a distinguished road
Default Oil treatments

Are any of the oil treatments (duralube, slick50, prolong, etc) acutally worth buying. I know there are a few mechs around here and would like there opinion. Thanks for the help.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2003 | 04:21 PM
  #2  
NVSSEI's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a 4 Banger
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
NVSSEI is on a distinguished road
Default

At the risk of bringing in the naysayers, I'll bite.
I have seen firsthand what Prolong will do. Long story short, after using Prolong for six months a buddy had an object puncture his oil pan on the freeway at 75 mph. He drove it until he lost oil pressure (trying to get off the freeway). When we pulled the engine to replace the oil pan and repair whatever damage there was, we were shocked at the lack of damage to the engine. He ended up just replacing the pan and putting it back in. 40,000 miles later, it'* still going strong. Use this as you wish or not.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2003 | 04:58 PM
  #3  
acg_ssei's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,409
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, IL
acg_ssei is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Oil treatments

Originally Posted by Mayhem_3
Are any of the oil treatments (duralube, slick50, prolong, etc) acutally worth buying. I know there are a few mechs around here and would like there opinion.
No. Obviously the car companies and oil companies would be using and recommending them if they did. See your manual.

http://www.oldengine.org/unfaq/additive.htm
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2003 | 05:00 PM
  #4  
SSEi95's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
SSEi95 is on a distinguished road
Default

I have hearsay only. I have heard that Slick50 has been known to clog the small passageways that the oil needs to flow thru. I personally haven't tried it yet.

I also remember reading here somewhere (back in the day) that Z-max (I think) actully had a class action lawsuit against them because of thier product. Let me check...

Yup. here!
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2003 | 05:16 PM
  #5  
acg_ssei's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,409
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, IL
acg_ssei is on a distinguished road
Default

P.*. The Federal Trade Commission has all sorts of fascinating stuff about Slick 50 and similar miracle products that got hammered for making false and unsubstantiated claims. You can search their website (start at http://www.ftc.gov and select the Search link at the bottom) and see for yourself.

Here'* one typical item: http://www.ftc.gov/opa/1997/07/slick.htm

"Three subsidiaries of Quaker State Corp. have agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that ads for Quaker State'* Slick 50 Engine Treatment were false and unsubstantiated."
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tverhein
1992-1999
20
Sep 15, 2004 08:28 PM
SSEi
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
4
Sep 2, 2003 12:23 AM
TelePlayer
1992-1999
7
Jul 30, 2003 04:48 PM
MikeDiaz
1987-1991
3
Jul 21, 2003 07:07 PM
anthonyv62
General GM Chat
3
Jun 8, 2003 02:20 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:13 AM.