maf

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

11-24-2006, 10:51 PM

#21

1993 SLE

Senior Member

Certified Car Nut

Join Date: Oct 2003

Posts: 19,756

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by willwren

The point being that the numbers everyone is trying to compare here aren't actually part numbers.

....um

.....sorry for the confusion...i didnt know that

Reply Like

11-25-2006, 01:17 PM

#22

banned3800

Guest

Posts: n/a

Research is key...

95 3800 SC uses AC Delco 2131623

95 3800 II NA uses AC Delco 2131621

95 3800 SC uses Cardone 8650001

95 3800 II NA uses Cardone 8650004

I havent bothered to search GM

__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote

Reply Like

11-25-2006, 01:32 PM

#23

willwren

Junior Member

Posts like a Ricer Type-R

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 11

Likes: 0

Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Logic is also the key. There'* no way a NA MAF sensor could even begin to register the WOT airflow of an L67.

Reply Like

11-25-2006, 01:56 PM

#24

popatim

PopaDopaDo

True Car Nut

Join Date: Jan 2005

Location: NY

Posts: 4,957

Likes: 0

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Quote:

Originally Posted by Archon

Checking some part numbers...
For my 00 SSEi - 88961007
My son'* N/A 99 GP - 88961007
!

Things that make you go Hmmmm...

Reply Like

11-25-2006, 02:01 PM

#25

willwren

Junior Member

Posts like a Ricer Type-R

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 11

Likes: 0

Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by popatim

Quote:

Originally Posted by Archon

Checking some part numbers...
For my 00 SSEi - 88961007
My son'* N/A 99 GP - 88961007
!

Things that make you go Hmmmm...

Those should be the same part number. The TB on the L67 changed in 99.

Reply Like

11-25-2006, 02:13 PM

#26

popatim

PopaDopaDo

True Car Nut

Join Date: Jan 2005

Location: NY

Posts: 4,957

Likes: 0

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Off topic, but I was refering to your generalization regard the NA vs SC MAF which is obviously incorrect at this point. It does make me wonder how much more an L67 flows vs an L36 at WOT though.

Reply Like

11-25-2006, 02:40 PM

#27

willwren

Junior Member

Posts like a Ricer Type-R

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 11

Likes: 0

Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by popatim

Off topic, but I was refering to your generalization regard the NA vs SC MAF which is obviously incorrect at this point. It does make me wonder how much more an L67 flows vs an L36 at WOT though.

Easy to calculate. More than double the flow if you know the drive ratio of the SC, and the SC'* specs.

We flow as much or more than a 350 V8 at WOT IIRC. I'd have to re-do the calculations. Many of us are flowing in big-block territory with smaller pulleys.

Reply Like

11-25-2006, 11:54 PM

#28

adam marcum

Member

Posts like a V-Tak

Thread Starter

Join Date: Aug 2004

Posts: 52

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

sorry for the sh%^ i dont have eney logic on a car above 1980. lol thats way i asked for help here.and thank you all for the help.i read the forum'* about 4 hours evey night . so i can no more about my car. thank'*..