maf

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Nov 24, 2006 | 10:51 PM

#21

1993 SLE

Senior Member

Certified Car Nut

Joined: Oct 2003

Posts: 19,756

Likes: 1

Quote:

Originally Posted by willwren

The point being that the numbers everyone is trying to compare here aren't actually part numbers.

....um

.....sorry for the confusion...i didnt know that

Nov 25, 2006 | 01:17 PM

#22

banned3800

Guest

Posts: n/a

Research is key...

95 3800 SC uses AC Delco 2131623

95 3800 II NA uses AC Delco 2131621

95 3800 SC uses Cardone 8650001

95 3800 II NA uses Cardone 8650004

I havent bothered to search GM

__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote

Nov 25, 2006 | 01:32 PM

#23

willwren

Junior Member

Posts like a Ricer Type-R

Joined: Aug 2002

Posts: 11

Likes: 13

Logic is also the key. There'* no way a NA MAF sensor could even begin to register the WOT airflow of an L67.

Nov 25, 2006 | 01:56 PM

#24

popatim

PopaDopaDo

True Car Nut

Joined: Jan 2005

Posts: 4,957

Likes: 4

From: NY

Quote:

Originally Posted by Archon

Checking some part numbers...
For my 00 SSEi - 88961007
My son'* N/A 99 GP - 88961007
!

Things that make you go Hmmmm...

Nov 25, 2006 | 02:01 PM

#25

willwren

Junior Member

Posts like a Ricer Type-R

Joined: Aug 2002

Posts: 11

Likes: 13

Quote:

Originally Posted by popatim

Quote:

Originally Posted by Archon

Checking some part numbers...
For my 00 SSEi - 88961007
My son'* N/A 99 GP - 88961007
!

Things that make you go Hmmmm...

Those should be the same part number. The TB on the L67 changed in 99.

Nov 25, 2006 | 02:13 PM

#26

popatim

PopaDopaDo

True Car Nut

Joined: Jan 2005

Posts: 4,957

Likes: 4

From: NY

Off topic, but I was refering to your generalization regard the NA vs SC MAF which is obviously incorrect at this point. It does make me wonder how much more an L67 flows vs an L36 at WOT though.

Nov 25, 2006 | 02:40 PM

#27

willwren

Junior Member

Posts like a Ricer Type-R

Joined: Aug 2002

Posts: 11

Likes: 13

Quote:

Originally Posted by popatim

Off topic, but I was refering to your generalization regard the NA vs SC MAF which is obviously incorrect at this point. It does make me wonder how much more an L67 flows vs an L36 at WOT though.

Easy to calculate. More than double the flow if you know the drive ratio of the SC, and the SC'* specs.

We flow as much or more than a 350 V8 at WOT IIRC. I'd have to re-do the calculations. Many of us are flowing in big-block territory with smaller pulleys.

Nov 25, 2006 | 11:54 PM

#28

adam marcum

Thread Starter

Member

Posts like a V-Tak

Joined: Aug 2004

Posts: 52

Likes: 0

sorry for the sh%^ i dont have eney logic on a car above 1980. lol thats way i asked for help here.and thank you all for the help.i read the forum'* about 4 hours evey night . so i can no more about my car. thank'*..