maf - Page 3 - GM Forum - Buick, Cadillac, Chev, Olds, GMC & Pontiac chat


1992-1999 Series I L27 (1992-1994 SE,SLE, SSE) & Series II L36 (1995-1999 SE, SSE, SLE) and common problems for the Series I and II L67 (all supercharged models 92-99) Including Olds 88's, Olds LSS's and Buick Lesabres Please use General Chat for non-mechanical issues, and Performance and Brainstorming for improvements.

Reply
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-24-2006, 11:51 PM   #21
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 19,756
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
1993 SLE is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by willwren
The point being that the numbers everyone is trying to compare here aren't actually part numbers.
oh ....um .....sorry for the confusion...i didnt know that
1993 SLE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2006, 02:17 PM   #22
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 0
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
banned3800 is on a distinguished road
Default

Research is key...

95 3800 SC uses AC Delco 2131623

95 3800 II NA uses AC Delco 2131621



95 3800 SC uses Cardone 8650001

95 3800 II NA uses Cardone 8650004

I havent bothered to search GM

__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
banned3800 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2006, 02:32 PM   #23
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
willwren is on a distinguished road
Default

Logic is also the key. There'* no way a NA MAF sensor could even begin to register the WOT airflow of an L67.
willwren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2006, 02:56 PM   #24
PopaDopaDo
True Car Nut
 
popatim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 4,957
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
popatim is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Archon
Checking some part numbers...
For my 00 SSEi - 88961007
My son'* N/A 99 GP - 88961007
!
Things that make you go Hmmmm...
popatim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2006, 03:01 PM   #25
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
willwren is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by popatim
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archon
Checking some part numbers...
For my 00 SSEi - 88961007
My son'* N/A 99 GP - 88961007
!
Things that make you go Hmmmm...
Those should be the same part number. The TB on the L67 changed in 99.
willwren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2006, 03:13 PM   #26
PopaDopaDo
True Car Nut
 
popatim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 4,957
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
popatim is on a distinguished road
Default

Off topic, but I was refering to your generalization regard the NA vs SC MAF which is obviously incorrect at this point. It does make me wonder how much more an L67 flows vs an L36 at WOT though.
popatim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2006, 03:40 PM   #27
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
willwren is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by popatim
Off topic, but I was refering to your generalization regard the NA vs SC MAF which is obviously incorrect at this point. It does make me wonder how much more an L67 flows vs an L36 at WOT though.
Easy to calculate. More than double the flow if you know the drive ratio of the SC, and the SC'* specs.

We flow as much or more than a 350 V8 at WOT IIRC. I'd have to re-do the calculations. Many of us are flowing in big-block territory with smaller pulleys.
willwren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2006, 12:54 AM   #28
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 52
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
adam marcum is on a distinguished road
Default

sorry for the sh%^ i dont have eney logic on a car above 1980. lol thats way i asked for help here.and thank you all for the help.i read the forum'* about 4 hours evey night . so i can no more about my car. thank'*..
adam marcum is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Removing the MAF Screen: Pros and Cons brminder Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning 21 12-17-2002 02:01 AM
MAF Sensor (ECM Code 34) Reverand Jim 1992-1999 8 11-05-2002 03:58 AM
K&N - bad for MAF? DanCulkin Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning 5 11-03-2002 07:28 PM
MAF screen removal?????? Lithium 1992-1999 38 09-26-2002 10:07 AM
Another MAF screen story! willwren 1992-1999 5 09-01-2002 11:53 PM


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:03 PM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.