1992-1999 Series I L27 (1992-1994 SE,SLE, SSE) & Series II L36 (1995-1999 SE, SSE, SLE) and common problems for the Series I and II L67 (all supercharged models 92-99) Including Olds 88's, Olds LSS's and Buick Lesabres Please use General Chat for non-mechanical issues, and Performance and Brainstorming for improvements.

Bottom end of engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-14-2004, 01:30 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
 
Foghorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Montréal, QC
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Foghorn is on a distinguished road
Default

I have no idea about the Series I engines, but the Series II share the same bottom end with one very large exception that should pertain to Series I also;

The compression ratios are different and of course the pistons differ.

All other reasons aside, it would be unwise to consider it based on pistons and compression alone.

Cheers,
Old 09-14-2004, 01:31 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
 
BonneMeMN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,928
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
BonneMeMN is on a distinguished road
Default

Everything i've read said Series I was 8.5 on both N/A and */C.
Old 09-14-2004, 01:34 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
 
Foghorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Montréal, QC
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Foghorn is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by BonneMeMN
Everything i've read said Series I was 8.5 on both N/A and */C.
Ah well that rules out my theory then .

Cheers,
Old 09-14-2004, 01:44 PM
  #14  
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
 
willwren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
willwren is on a distinguished road
Default

Differing thoughts on this would tend to suggest there may be some risk involved. Even with the same compression ratio, there can still be some major differences.
Old 09-14-2004, 02:17 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
 
BonneMeMN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,928
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
BonneMeMN is on a distinguished road
Default

I know of 2 MN members sorta looking for a series I L67 to tear into. We may be able to get some parts next to eachother if that happens.
Old 09-14-2004, 05:31 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
 
BonneMeMN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,928
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
BonneMeMN is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by jr's3800
Jason if you ever do have the chance... There are diffrent part numbers on the rods and pistons.... But supposedly the crank will be the same... Did you by chance keep the pistons and rods from the L27?
I'll bring mine back here next time i'm at home... But they were given out as trophy'* to those who demo'd the engine.... Smellbird, Damemorder, allmachtige, and some others have one as well.
Old 09-15-2004, 01:30 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
 
JimmyFloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,993
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JimmyFloyd is on a distinguished road
Default

In reading the GM service manuals for 93, I have found the Compression Ration for the L27 is 8.5:1 whereas the L67 is 9.0:1. Other than that, I cannot see a difference based on specification. With this info, would it be possible to change the internals to get the block and crankshaft at the same compression in an L27 block as a L67? Would it would alright if the compression was lower as in it would be using the L27 without changing parts?
Old 09-15-2004, 11:55 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
 
JimmyFloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,993
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JimmyFloyd is on a distinguished road
Default

This is Straight from my 1993 Bonneville Service Manual

Service Manual Page

(edited by willwren for copyright)
Please don't post pics or scans of copyrighted material, particularly that material covered by GM copyrights.

FYI, the link showed a pic with the compression ratios:

8.5:1 for L67
9.0:1 for L27

(93 service manual)
Old 09-16-2004, 07:49 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
 
57chevythunder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sheridan Wyoming
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
57chevythunder is on a distinguished road
Default

-kind of following this topic along, just for interest. I'm wondering if you guys are going to find out that the supercharged engine has to have a lower "static" compression ratio, in order to survive under full boost?

(-that is certainly the case with all of the SC V-8'* I've ever been around.)
Old 09-17-2004, 12:09 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
 
DrJay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DrJay is on a distinguished road
Default

Hmm..where'* '93 in the mix? I assume same as '92.

If anyone can look at the pistons on a '94 l27 you should be able to tell. If they're dished like the l67 then chances are they're the same compression. If so that SHOULD mean they are the same bottom end. I've heard they're all 8.5:1 also.


Quick Reply: Bottom end of engine



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:49 AM.