1992-1999 Series I L27 (1992-1994 SE,SLE, SSE) & Series II L36 (1995-1999 SE, SSE, SLE) and common problems for the Series I and II L67 (all supercharged models 92-99) Including Olds 88's, Olds LSS's and Buick Lesabres Please use General Chat for non-mechanical issues, and Performance and Brainstorming for improvements.

Is this bad for my engine?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 7, 2003 | 04:00 AM
  #1  
CraZyDriVer868's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
From: Monticello, Minnesota
CraZyDriVer868 is on a distinguished road
Default Is this bad for my engine?

Everytime ig et gas i put 93 in...and i put stp gas treatment and STP octane booster...am i wrecking my engine with teh octane booster?????
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2003 | 08:14 AM
  #2  
DeathRat's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, AB Canada
DeathRat is on a distinguished road
Default

I've found that unless your engine is modified enough to warrant the higher octane, then you're just wasting your money. It will not harm your engine, just your pocket book.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2003 | 02:31 PM
  #3  
acg_ssei's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,409
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, IL
acg_ssei is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Is this bad for my engine?

Originally Posted by CraZyDriVer868
Everytime ig et gas i put 93 in...and i put stp gas treatment and STP octane booster...am i wrecking my engine with teh octane booster?????
You don't need the octane booster unless you want to fry your plugs; the 93 itself should be sufficient. Heck, running 93 octane alone in my car gives me enough acceleration to scare myself with.

So what problem are you trying to correct with all that?
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2003 | 03:30 PM
  #4  
CraZyDriVer868's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
From: Monticello, Minnesota
CraZyDriVer868 is on a distinguished road
Default

so should i keep using the gas treatment and just stop the octane booster?
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2003 | 03:44 PM
  #5  
acg_ssei's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,409
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, IL
acg_ssei is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by CraZyDriVer868
so should i keep using the gas treatment and just stop the octane booster?
In the absence of some fuel-related problem, I don't know if I would use either one, but that'* just me...
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2003 | 04:32 PM
  #6  
CraZyDriVer868's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
From: Monticello, Minnesota
CraZyDriVer868 is on a distinguished road
Default

oh ok...i supose you can only clean injectors soo much...so should i just put a bottle of each in when i change my oil?
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2003 | 05:19 PM
  #7  
acg_ssei's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,409
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, IL
acg_ssei is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by CraZyDriVer868
oh ok...i supose you can only clean injectors soo much...so should i just put a bottle of each in when i change my oil?
Well, it'* like this: Major-brand 93-octane gas has all sorts of detergent additives in it already, to keep your injectors clean, keep the fuel system seals in good shape, give you fuller, bouncier hair, etc. It'* not likely that adding more fuel treatment to that is going to get you even _more_ something-or-other that you haven't got enough of already.

If you were buying discount-priced, no-name 87-octane junk for your old Chevy, then maybe some fuel-system treatment would make sense there, but if you're putting mainstream-branded 93-octane in your Bonne, then I'd say that in your case, fuel-system treatment would be a cure in search of a disease.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2003 | 07:25 PM
  #8  
Kuhl's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Kuhl is on a distinguished road
Default

Like has been previously stated 93 octane has more additives than 87 or mid octane, but I recommend putting in a bottle of Chevron'* Techron in the tank every time you change your oil. Its a concentrated version of the stuff Chevron has in their gasoline and is fully synthetic. You'll pay 6 bucks for it but its hard to find any that is better for that price.

Yeah definetely don't waste your money on that STP stuff everytime. They recommend it but... of course they do.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2003 | 07:47 PM
  #9  
Muslimsteel's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: Severna Park, Maryland US
Muslimsteel is on a distinguished road
Default

i always put 87 in mine and it seems to run ok...ive considered 93 but it seems a waste, if i had a */C then i would put it in it...unless someone has a point to y i should run 93?
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2003 | 09:31 PM
  #10  
acg_ssei's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,409
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, IL
acg_ssei is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by Muslimsteel
i always put 87 in mine and it seems to run ok...ive considered 93 but it seems a waste, if i had a */C then i would put it in it...unless someone has a point to y i should run 93?
Since you don't have a supercharger, I don't think you have "PREMIUM FUEL ONLY" on your dash, do you? Assuming you don't, you might want to at least try 89 octane and see if you get better performance.

Right now, your knock sensor is probably retarding the engine so that you don't hear any knocking, but if you get a tankful of 89 octane, you might give the knock sensor a little less work to do, and find that the engine performs better. Certainly worth a try...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SilverSleeper8704
Buick
15
Mar 30, 2020 09:41 PM
BonnieBrougham
Lounge
3
Dec 16, 2004 05:38 PM
h1081dan
Lounge
22
Oct 28, 2003 11:54 PM
lash92ssei
Your Ride: GM Pictures & Videos
12
Aug 19, 2003 04:05 PM
Mr Bean
1992-1999
9
Feb 19, 2003 11:34 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:01 AM.