1992-1999 Series I L27 (1992-1994 SE,SLE, SSE) & Series II L36 (1995-1999 SE, SSE, SLE) and common problems for the Series I and II L67 (all supercharged models 92-99) Including Olds 88's, Olds LSS's and Buick Lesabres Please use General Chat for non-mechanical issues, and Performance and Brainstorming for improvements.

33% improvement in gas mileage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-11-2005, 10:25 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
 
bill buttermore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ames, Iowa
Posts: 3,066
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
bill buttermore is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by Bob Dillon
60K?

Ruh roh.

123K and I've never changed it. I guess I better take a look.
The SLE had 133K on it when the fuel economy suddenly dropped from 24 to 18 mpg within two tanks of gas. The subject line - "Fuel economy restored" just doesn't grab you, but would have been more accurate. Idon't know if the previous owner had ever changed it. The old one was an AC/Delco. I think it is more common for them to go bad slowly. If your mpg is still good, the O2 is probably OK. My '95 is stock except for a gutted air box. Considering that my combined mpg is 24, I'm thinkin' on a cool day with no AC, no wind, flat roads, all trip miles, and a gentle touch, I might be able to come close to 30mpg.
Old 10-11-2005, 02:56 PM
  #13  
DINOSAURUS BOOSTUS

Expert Gearhead
 
BillBoost37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Enfield, CT
Posts: 41,391
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
BillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of light
Default

No idea when my 97 had one..but yes.. I was able to net 33.5 on an extended trip.

Pretty good mileage on trips considering GM only told us mid 20'*..
Old 10-11-2005, 03:36 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
LittleHoov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Climax Springs, Missouri
Posts: 2,493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LittleHoov is on a distinguished road
Default

just tossin my $.02 cents in here, i noticed a heavy decline in mpg after replacing my upper intake after it went....i would say that the massive amount of coolant i burned off messed up the O2 sensor, i puffed white smoke for a good 5-10 minutes.. so i would say definetely check and/or replace the sensor if youve had intake failure..anyone else agree? disagree?
Old 10-11-2005, 03:37 PM
  #15  
DINOSAURUS BOOSTUS

Expert Gearhead
 
BillBoost37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Enfield, CT
Posts: 41,391
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
BillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Agree it'* worth pulling and looking at.. if ugly..replace
Old 10-11-2005, 04:14 PM
  #17  
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
 
jebstuart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
jebstuart is on a distinguished road
Default They get lazy like we do

What happens as the O2 sensor gets old from use and many hot cold cycles they start to respond slower to the oxygen level in the exhaust. That is why they still will read ok with scan tool but when they are replaced u will see mpg go up. The sensor in front of the cat is the most important one regarding mpg. The rear one senses if catalytic converter is working properly.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nashville Cowboy
General GM Chat
26
02-06-2007 05:23 PM
Paulnold
1992-1999
15
02-11-2005 09:57 PM
SSEBONNE4EVA
1992-1999
3
04-26-2004 06:51 PM
MOS95B
Lounge
3
03-15-2004 04:49 PM
2000SilverBullet
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
5
02-09-2003 12:57 AM



Quick Reply: 33% improvement in gas mileage



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:46 AM.