1992-1999 Series I L27 (1992-1994 SE,SLE, SSE) & Series II L36 (1995-1999 SE, SSE, SLE) and common problems for the Series I and II L67 (all supercharged models 92-99) Including Olds 88's, Olds LSS's and Buick Lesabres Please use General Chat for non-mechanical issues, and Performance and Brainstorming for improvements.

33% improvement in gas mileage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 11, 2005 | 10:25 AM
  #11  
bill buttermore's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,066
Likes: 10
From: Ames, Iowa
bill buttermore is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by Bob Dillon
60K?

Ruh roh.

123K and I've never changed it. I guess I better take a look.
The SLE had 133K on it when the fuel economy suddenly dropped from 24 to 18 mpg within two tanks of gas. The subject line - "Fuel economy restored" just doesn't grab you, but would have been more accurate. Idon't know if the previous owner had ever changed it. The old one was an AC/Delco. I think it is more common for them to go bad slowly. If your mpg is still good, the O2 is probably OK. My '95 is stock except for a gutted air box. Considering that my combined mpg is 24, I'm thinkin' on a cool day with no AC, no wind, flat roads, all trip miles, and a gentle touch, I might be able to come close to 30mpg.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2005 | 02:56 PM
  #13  
BillBoost37's Avatar
DINOSAURUS BOOSTUS

Expert Gearhead
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 41,391
Likes: 30
From: Enfield, CT
BillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of light
Default

No idea when my 97 had one..but yes.. I was able to net 33.5 on an extended trip.

Pretty good mileage on trips considering GM only told us mid 20'*..
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2005 | 03:36 PM
  #14  
LittleHoov's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,493
Likes: 0
From: Climax Springs, Missouri
LittleHoov is on a distinguished road
Default

just tossin my $.02 cents in here, i noticed a heavy decline in mpg after replacing my upper intake after it went....i would say that the massive amount of coolant i burned off messed up the O2 sensor, i puffed white smoke for a good 5-10 minutes.. so i would say definetely check and/or replace the sensor if youve had intake failure..anyone else agree? disagree?
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2005 | 03:37 PM
  #15  
BillBoost37's Avatar
DINOSAURUS BOOSTUS

Expert Gearhead
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 41,391
Likes: 30
From: Enfield, CT
BillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Agree it'* worth pulling and looking at.. if ugly..replace
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2005 | 04:14 PM
  #17  
jebstuart's Avatar
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
jebstuart is on a distinguished road
Default They get lazy like we do

What happens as the O2 sensor gets old from use and many hot cold cycles they start to respond slower to the oxygen level in the exhaust. That is why they still will read ok with scan tool but when they are replaced u will see mpg go up. The sensor in front of the cat is the most important one regarding mpg. The rear one senses if catalytic converter is working properly.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nashville Cowboy
General GM Chat
26
Feb 6, 2007 05:23 PM
Paulnold
1992-1999
15
Feb 11, 2005 09:57 PM
SSEBONNE4EVA
1992-1999
3
Apr 26, 2004 06:51 PM
MOS95B
Lounge
3
Mar 15, 2004 04:49 PM
2000SilverBullet
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
5
Feb 9, 2003 12:57 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:34 PM.