gear ratios
#21
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1993 SLE
Originally Posted by spidey3479
Ok, so I read that backwards and my car having a lower fdr is better for my engine, right? :?
#22
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: BonnevilleHell
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by spidey3479
So this is not hurting anything for it to have the high revs until I rebuild the OEM tranny?
Now, joining back to your problem from a few days ago: Because the Cutlass transmission was set up for a motor with a higher rev limit, it probably is still trying to use the 3.1L Cutlass setup to do it'* shifts. This is where it get'* sticky, since you have jumped off the normal diagnostic charts into a whole new realm. (Ain't part swappin fun!!!)
I would venture a guess at this point that the governor in the transmission is what is causing the higher than normal rpm up-shifts. The governor uses the vehicle speed (it'* gear driven off the output shaft) vs. line pressure modulated by the Thottle Valve and vac operated modulator. Problem is, it doesn't "know" the rev limits on the motor driving the input shaft. It was calibrated for the 3.1L motor and the Cutlass weight. What you might need is a governor calibrated for the Bonneville'* weight and the 3800 motor.
Good news is the governor is easy to get to. It'* on the top of the transmission right where the passenger side axle exits the case. You don't have to dissassemble the transmission to make a change to it'* springs and weights.
Bill: Thanks for posting the link to the drive ratios. Made lights go off...I'm not used to having *all* the gears inside the transmission case. Just takes some getting used to. At least I dug up the build sheet for the '90 and looked at the codes for mine: F17 - 2.84 final with a 1:1 chain...so I keep my eyes peeled for an FW2 code in the junkyards (for the 3.06 final)
#23
Guest
Posts: n/a
Curt I love your explanation... Can't wait to meet you in person at the meet...
The 3.33 ratio will not hurt the 3800... They can be a fun around town car with that gear ratio.... The old LN3 3800 are some pretty good war horse engines... I feel that 2.84 is a bit too heavy( even tho the engine does make great low end torque for what it is )... The 2.97 would have been the optimum ratio in my opinion... But even my junker 91 SSE with the 3.33 ratio is on the original trans and engine at 250k ... So no I do not feel it will harm the engine...
If we look at the 2.84 ratio, at times it seems as if the tall ratio tends to lug the engine a little at low speeds... But I have yet to hear of any engine that has failed... I have found a couple of 88 LN3 engines that even had the 2.73 gear ratio...
I feel that these engines really don't need to spin much past the redline, But getting them to 5500 has never seemed to be a challange... But it HP peak is 4400 rpms so there is almost no point in being there....
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
The 3.33 ratio will not hurt the 3800... They can be a fun around town car with that gear ratio.... The old LN3 3800 are some pretty good war horse engines... I feel that 2.84 is a bit too heavy( even tho the engine does make great low end torque for what it is )... The 2.97 would have been the optimum ratio in my opinion... But even my junker 91 SSE with the 3.33 ratio is on the original trans and engine at 250k ... So no I do not feel it will harm the engine...
If we look at the 2.84 ratio, at times it seems as if the tall ratio tends to lug the engine a little at low speeds... But I have yet to hear of any engine that has failed... I have found a couple of 88 LN3 engines that even had the 2.73 gear ratio...
I feel that these engines really don't need to spin much past the redline, But getting them to 5500 has never seemed to be a challange... But it HP peak is 4400 rpms so there is almost no point in being there....
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
#24
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Lancaster, South Carolina
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thank you, thank you! Do you think I can just take the governor from the oem tranny and put them in the olds' tranny I have in the bonne now? Or should I try getting a new one from somewhere. (tranny parts warehouse or junkyard)
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by spidey3479
Thank you, thank you! Do you think I can just take the governor from the oem tranny and put them in the olds' tranny I have in the bonne now? Or should I try getting a new one from somewhere. (tranny parts warehouse or junkyard)
So Far I have been lucky with my 2.84 Trans in my 91 LE... Its still going
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
#26
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Lancaster, South Carolina
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks to all for all the info I will try to get all this down to carry with me to junk yards around here. When I call some of these guys will they understand all of what I am describing with the drive ratio or RPO or do I ask for the right years and just go hunting myself?
#27
Guest
Posts: n/a
Some will know what you are looking for others could care less or may not know...
You will want to take a look at the RPO listing on the spare tire cover... Also I would reccomend 90-91 for the trans as opposed to the 89... Unless the 89 has an SRTA, or is a low milage unit... The 90-91 has some updates to correct for issues they had with the earlier units... Make sure you have the 5 wire tranny electrical connector like your car to save you a small headache... Other than that just make sure the tranny fluid isn't black or burnt...
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
You will want to take a look at the RPO listing on the spare tire cover... Also I would reccomend 90-91 for the trans as opposed to the 89... Unless the 89 has an SRTA, or is a low milage unit... The 90-91 has some updates to correct for issues they had with the earlier units... Make sure you have the 5 wire tranny electrical connector like your car to save you a small headache... Other than that just make sure the tranny fluid isn't black or burnt...
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
#29
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: BonnevilleHell
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jr's3800
Curt I love your explanation... Can't wait to meet you in person at the meet...
Spidey: You sound like you are on a roll now. If you've picked a tranny shop to rebuild your existing one, talk to them about the governor on your existing transmission. They may be able to reach into the magic parts bin and pull out a good choice of weights and springs to fix the problem without you having to go junkyarding.
There'* no harm in plopping the governor from the original Bonneville into the Cutlass transmission. It may work right, it might not, but the attempt costs you nothing but a little time to try it.