1987-1991 Parley with regards to your 1987 to 1991 Bonneville, Olds 88 or Buick Le Sabre Please use General Chat for non-mechanical issues, and Performance and Brainstorming for improvements.

Finally decided to go Synthetic!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 09:48 AM
  #11  
BillBoost37's Avatar
DINOSAURUS BOOSTUS

Expert Gearhead
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 41,391
Likes: 30
From: Enfield, CT
BillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of light
Default

One of the best parts of syn is it doesn't break down quickly. Therefore your pressure will be more constant.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 12:02 PM
  #12  
sse1990's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,936
Likes: 2
sse1990 is on a distinguished road
Default

I change mine every 2 months, but that is about 10,000 kms per change. I usually check it at 5,000 kms and it still looks almost like new.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2006 | 11:45 PM
  #13  
five7kid's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a 4 Banger
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Littleton, CO
five7kid is on a distinguished road
Default

I hesitate to post on threads like this, because there is so much misinformation out there. I've been using AMSOIL synthetic products since 1983. I currently have six vehicles in the "fleet". The oil is changed at one year or 25k miles, whichever comes first, with the filter changed at half that.

A cam bearing gave out on our '90 SSE at 200k miles. We got the car at 104k miles, at which time I converted it over to synthetic. I haven't taken the engine apart yet to determine exactly how the bearing failed, but from what I have gathered, it isn't "oil related". Did I mention it started life as a rental?

I could go on & on about other longevity stories, but there will always be someone who will say, "My engine went that long on regular dyno juice." Of course, there'* no way to verify either one of our stories (although I will only tell the absolute truth), but I certainly have spent a lot less money and time on oil changes over the years than those following the majors' change recommendation.

But, I hesitate to post on threads like this. . .
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2006 | 03:37 PM
  #14  
jdq's Avatar
jdq
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 1
From: Hamilton, Ontario , Canada
jdq is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote " with the filter changed at half that"

Just curious do you just take it off with oil spewing all over and put new one on,maybe dumb question but it does sound like a good idea.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2006 | 09:54 PM
  #15  
Timothy's Buick's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 380
Likes: 1
From: Fredericton, New Brunswick.
Timothy's Buick is on a distinguished road
Default

I'm not exactly sure what you mean, but I put a pan under the filter. The location of the filter, which is over the frame, makes it so oil drips right out of the engine, overflowing the filter, running on the frame, and into the pan, making a slight mess.

When I put a new filter on, I lubricate the gasket, and fill the filter as much as I can, then it gets screwed back on.
Filling the filter isn't really that neccessary. On side mounted filters, you can't do it.

I put synthetic in there, for several reasons. One is it doesn't break down, foam, etc. I put alot of kms on my Buick, and sometimes, I like to have a little fun with the engine while driving. It just gives me peace of mind.

No leaks so far, works well.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skippy1827
Lounge
9
Apr 21, 2008 02:03 PM
Custom88
Audio (and aftermarket electronics)
12
Sep 9, 2004 12:08 AM
Glasuan
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
5
Feb 28, 2004 11:52 AM
BadTA00
Lounge
7
Oct 31, 2003 11:58 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:15 AM.