Exhaust manifolds
That would help A LOT.
01-18-2004, 06:53 PM
#6
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by jr's3800
Well look at it this way...
3800 V6 88-94 and 95 in the Minivans.. The exahust ports are like so
O.....O...........O
3800 II 1995 and later
O........O.........O
This is not totally correct, just an example.. But the exahust ports are in a bit of a diffrent location... Where as the 3800 II engines have exahust ports spaced the same distance apart from eachother... I would like to have a set of Tubular manifolds on my 95 like I have on the 91 though... Those tubular manifolds ( Factory so so headers in my opinion) have a sound all their own... don't even sound the same as 3800 II powered car... The 88-94 bonnevilles just sounded better... Oh well
3800 V6 88-94 and 95 in the Minivans.. The exahust ports are like so
O.....O...........O
3800 II 1995 and later
O........O.........O
This is not totally correct, just an example.. But the exahust ports are in a bit of a diffrent location... Where as the 3800 II engines have exahust ports spaced the same distance apart from eachother... I would like to have a set of Tubular manifolds on my 95 like I have on the 91 though... Those tubular manifolds ( Factory so so headers in my opinion) have a sound all their own... don't even sound the same as 3800 II powered car... The 88-94 bonnevilles just sounded better... Oh well
01-18-2004, 07:56 PM
#8
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah if memory serves its actually on the far sides that they don't match up. Series 1 goes - Exhaust-intake exhaust-intake intake-exhaust. Series 2 goes - Exhaust-intake exhaust-intake exhaust-intake. So its really the last chamber on each head that doesn't match up. Looks more like
0....0.......0 vs.
0....0....0
Here'* something though, is there a difference in exhaust design from supercharged to n/a? I read on GM'* webpage that (at least the newer) n/a and */c share the same heads. But for performance I would think that */c got a beefed up exhaust. Possible but I dunno. Anyone have an idea?
0....0.......0 vs.
0....0....0
Here'* something though, is there a difference in exhaust design from supercharged to n/a? I read on GM'* webpage that (at least the newer) n/a and */c share the same heads. But for performance I would think that */c got a beefed up exhaust. Possible but I dunno. Anyone have an idea?
01-18-2004, 09:24 PM
#9
Executed
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Purgatory
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jr's3800
r... The 88-94 bonnevilles just sounded better... Oh well
Mike D :o
01-19-2004, 12:16 AM
#10
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bloomington-Normal, IL 1997 SE
Posts: 3,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i dont know.. maybe i just really like my car in every way and am imagening that it soudns cool hahahaha
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
h1081dan
General GM Chat
39
10-28-2003 08:40 PM
brminder
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
9
02-28-2003 01:35 PM