3" exhaust = POWER!!
#41
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dbtk2
So when did you put the PCM in??? The first pull says 3.4 pulley only. Second pull says 3.4 pulley, 1.9 rockers, 3" exhaust. Yet, your sig says you also have a DHP!?!?
Shawn
Shawn
#42
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Holt, MI & Lima, OH
Posts: 3,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dans2002bonne
Originally Posted by dbtk2
So when did you put the PCM in??? The first pull says 3.4 pulley only. Second pull says 3.4 pulley, 1.9 rockers, 3" exhaust. Yet, your sig says you also have a DHP!?!?
Shawn
Shawn
The reason I ask is because you started out the post with "just got the car off the chassis dyno," which I would take to mean, today or yesterday or pretty recently, and then you say originally it had a 3.4 pulley only. Then you say on the pull that you just the car off the dyno from, it had the 1.9 rockers and 3" exhaust added. And your sig says you have the pulley, rockers, exhaust, and PCM. If this just happened, then that means that you somehow squeezed the PCM in there between the time you dynoed and the time you post this, which, by the sounds of it, doesn't seem like a lot of time. So the story isn't lining up somewhere.... To get straight to the point, I was trying to make sure that you didn't throw the PCM in there between those two pulls or something, and maybe you forgot about it or something.
Shawn
#43
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey there. No, neither pull was done with the program in the PCM. The first time I had the car dyno'd, was last year right after the pulley install. That is where the first numbers are from. After this everyone was searching for a DHP for the SSEI'*. Well I ran into Mr. Buckshaw. So, he did his thing. Not too long ago my car developed a shudder at free way speeds slowly accelerating from 65 up to 75. Afraid it was something inside the tranny, I took the car back up Daves way, we reflashed the car back to stock, so I could visit the dealer. As of today I have not gone back to see him as I let him help me at his convenience because he is probably the best business guy I've ever dealt with. So this in turn is how the two dyno pulls were both done, by chance, without any program outside of factory.
#44
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Sorry to chime in again so late in the discussion... I just wanted to comment about the question of driveline hp loss. I would agree that extra power could be lost due to increased strain put on components, but it wouldn't increase proportionally to the mechanical loss of the stock setup. Sorry if that'* a ten-dollar sentence, but I'll try to explain myself. The amount of power lost due to the mechanical nature of the stock driveline might be 40-50 hp, whereas when you run a 400 hp motor you might lose 60 hp in the driveline due to mechanics + extra friction. Yes, you're losing more power, but power lost to friction isn't in the same ratio as percent of stock engine power compared with stock wheel hp. Confused yet? Lol, sorry. To make a long answer short, I don't think you can add mechanical power loss to frictional power loss and come up with a reliable ratio that can be used on any power configuration. I don't want to ruffle feathers here, I just don't see how it could be possible. We can start another thread if we need to. Sorry for the hijack!
#46
Senior Member
Posts like a Northstar
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Purgatory
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Let'* start with the exhaust. Backpressure is bad the end. If the exhaust is too small it will not flow enough volume and the waste gasses will not all make it out of the cylinder during the exhaust stroke. If the exhaust is too big it will not maintain sufficient velocity (the gasses will stall) again resulting in poor evacuation of the cylinder.
There are too many variables affecting this for the average enthusiast to calculate so, the only way to really tell is try it or trust the reputable after market manufacturers.
On to the transmission. Drive train losses are a percentage and they are not constant.
All streetcars have helical cut gears (manual and auto) to reduce noise. Most racecars have strait cut gears to reduce friction. Helical gears generate axial thrust in proportion to the angle of the helix and load on the gear set. Most manufacturers and tuners use a fixed percent loss of 15% to 22% to simplify things. It'* not exact but close enough for most real world uses.
There are too many variables affecting this for the average enthusiast to calculate so, the only way to really tell is try it or trust the reputable after market manufacturers.
On to the transmission. Drive train losses are a percentage and they are not constant.
All streetcars have helical cut gears (manual and auto) to reduce noise. Most racecars have strait cut gears to reduce friction. Helical gears generate axial thrust in proportion to the angle of the helix and load on the gear set. Most manufacturers and tuners use a fixed percent loss of 15% to 22% to simplify things. It'* not exact but close enough for most real world uses.
#47
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bloomington-Normal, IL 1997 SE
Posts: 3,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the only way to figure out the exact loss of one of our transmissions would be to take it and dyno it on the car, then dyno just the engine. THen you increase the power, and do it again. And repeat.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post