car/truck of the year wtf
#1
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
car/truck of the year wtf
honda ridgeline is the ugliest truck IMO ever produced how did that piece of crap make it as truck of the year??? and the civic a pos econobox that looks like a redesigned camry. who votes for these things? north american cars of the year.. my ***
#2
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
This is not Bonneville related. General Chat is being overrun with off-topic posts lately. Please post non-Bonneville related topics in the lounge.
I'll move this one for you.
I'll move this one for you.
#3
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: MI
Posts: 2,246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sounds like something car and driver would do. Actually, I think they might have done it.
Even though the Ridgeline had the lowest payload and towing capacity...it won because it got good gas mileage and was quiet and comfortable inside.
Anyone read Car and Driver'* "Cheap Speed" article? Out of the SRT4, Cobalt SS, Ion Redline, the WRX, and the Acura RSX Type-*...which do you think won?
Lets see, the SRT4 had the most HP and torque, best weight to power ratio, quickest acceleration times (in the 0-60, 0-100, AND the 0-120, fastest quarter mile time, fastest 5-60 time, fastest 50-90 time, fastest top speed, shortest braking distance, and the fastest autocross time.
Acura Type-* won...why? Did the best on the skid pad...and....it was the lightest and lowest to the ground...has a big trunk...wtf
It is the most expensive, slowest 0-60 time, slowest quarter mile time, and slowest autocross lap...
Way to go C&D...
Where was I going with this...................oh yeah....I think it is C&Ds fault.
Even though the Ridgeline had the lowest payload and towing capacity...it won because it got good gas mileage and was quiet and comfortable inside.
Anyone read Car and Driver'* "Cheap Speed" article? Out of the SRT4, Cobalt SS, Ion Redline, the WRX, and the Acura RSX Type-*...which do you think won?
Lets see, the SRT4 had the most HP and torque, best weight to power ratio, quickest acceleration times (in the 0-60, 0-100, AND the 0-120, fastest quarter mile time, fastest 5-60 time, fastest 50-90 time, fastest top speed, shortest braking distance, and the fastest autocross time.
Acura Type-* won...why? Did the best on the skid pad...and....it was the lightest and lowest to the ground...has a big trunk...wtf
It is the most expensive, slowest 0-60 time, slowest quarter mile time, and slowest autocross lap...
Way to go C&D...
Where was I going with this...................oh yeah....I think it is C&Ds fault.
#5
Senior Member
Posts like a Corvette
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I hate to be the guy to say it, but have you driven either one of these vehicles against another car/truck of its type? Until you've done that can you really denounce the decision?
I don't really like the decision either, but I can't complain cause I haven't driven either of these.
yet.
I don't really like the decision either, but I can't complain cause I haven't driven either of these.
yet.
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Logan
Even though the Ridgeline had the lowest payload and towing capacity...it won because it got good gas mileage and was quiet and comfortable inside.
trucks are going to "car like" for me... if you want a car buy a car.
just my opinion though
#8
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: MI
Posts: 2,246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Exactly.
I don't have the article myself....and I don't think it was even in the article but a letter to them that they printed. They talked about how if you go to downtown detroit how many pickups do you see...a lot. How many of them tow 4 tons on a weekly basis...probably none.
IMHO its their own friggen fault. They bought a truck, they should expect a rough ride, crappy MPG, and a rugged cabin as well.
If you want a car/truck get an escalade...not enough $$$, get an Avalanche...
I don't have the article myself....and I don't think it was even in the article but a letter to them that they printed. They talked about how if you go to downtown detroit how many pickups do you see...a lot. How many of them tow 4 tons on a weekly basis...probably none.
IMHO its their own friggen fault. They bought a truck, they should expect a rough ride, crappy MPG, and a rugged cabin as well.
If you want a car/truck get an escalade...not enough $$$, get an Avalanche...
#9
Senior Member
Posts like a Camaro
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chi-Town
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C&D lost their credibility with me a long time ago. I dont read any of their **** anymore. Just take their talk with a grain of salt and let the mob have their fun. If you do the research for yourself you know which is really the best car and truck out there. I dont need a shoddy magazine written by journalism school drop outs tell me which car or truck is the best when they are probably getting "favors" for the kinds of articles they write.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post