Post your numbers for a master MAF list!
10-08-2007, 11:46 AM
#41
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Holt, MI & Lima, OH
Posts: 3,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by sandrock
Thanks alot guys! I still need numbers from 2000-up L36'*.
So
96-98 L36/L67: AFH50M-04
99-03 L36/L67: AFH50M-05
Not sure why you have to look at 100 different cars to find info that is common knowledge on clubgp......
The Series I'* I can understand though.
10-08-2007, 12:23 PM
#42
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: In your garage, swipin' da lug nutz
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Y'know...you could have chimed in earlier with that info....that would have saved some post space 
And true...it may be common knowledge over there, but it isn't here...hence this posting. I for one, am not a member there, and I am sure there are many others on this forum that aren't members there either. If we aren't members, how are we to know it'* common knowledge?
It'* also true that this benefits the pre-S2 crowd the most. There seems to be alot more part numbers to look at, and it seems none of them are cross-compatible. In fact, the primary reason this post came about was because of a possible MAF failure and I wanted to see if there was ANY cross-compatibility. But when looking at the list, you can see when certain numbers got phased out. That'* helpful information as well.
And true...it may be common knowledge over there, but it isn't here...hence this posting. I for one, am not a member there, and I am sure there are many others on this forum that aren't members there either. If we aren't members, how are we to know it'* common knowledge?It'* also true that this benefits the pre-S2 crowd the most. There seems to be alot more part numbers to look at, and it seems none of them are cross-compatible. In fact, the primary reason this post came about was because of a possible MAF failure and I wanted to see if there was ANY cross-compatibility. But when looking at the list, you can see when certain numbers got phased out. That'* helpful information as well.
10-17-2007, 08:03 AM
#44
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: In your garage, swipin' da lug nutz
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Here is the mostly complete spreadsheet for the numbers...
Note I am still missing data on the earliest engines, which I figured that would happen. The 88-91 crowd, for all intents and purposes, are the minority of the group
Note I am still missing data on the earliest engines, which I figured that would happen. The 88-91 crowd, for all intents and purposes, are the minority of the group
10-17-2007, 04:25 PM
#45
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by wjcollier07
Ok, found my original 89 MAF!
AFH50M - 02A
number below it is 8616 if that helps any also. maybe just a sequence number? my maf was number 8616?
1989 LE - LN3 - Built: early december 1988
AFH50M - 02A
number below it is 8616 if that helps any also. maybe just a sequence number? my maf was number 8616?
1989 LE - LN3 - Built: early december 1988
10-23-2007, 07:53 PM
#47
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC ________ SEBF 07 survivor
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Post your numbers for a master MAF list!
Originally Posted by sandrock
I was talking with Don yesterday, and I brought up the idea of maybe putting together a master MAF sensor identification thread, and later posting in techinfo. I've seen several recent posts where info like this would come in very handy.
How does anyone else feel about it?
How does anyone else feel about it?
01-11-2008, 03:45 AM
#48
Senior Member
Posts like a Turbo
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Joplin, Missouri
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have the original MAF sensor on my T Type. Funny thing is that the motor came out of a 1990 Olds 88. I wonder if the T Type ECM is treating the Olds MAF incorrectly due to the model differences?
Anyway, I'll post up the number off it tomorrow when there'* light out :P
Anyway, I'll post up the number off it tomorrow when there'* light out :P
01-17-2008, 09:25 PM
#49
Senior Member
Posts like a Northstar
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dumfries, Virginia Member: #6887
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by sandrock
Here is the mostly complete spreadsheet for the numbers...
Note I am still missing data on the earliest engines, which I figured that would happen. The 88-91 crowd, for all intents and purposes, are the minority of the group
Note I am still missing data on the earliest engines, which I figured that would happen. The 88-91 crowd, for all intents and purposes, are the minority of the group
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1995-...spagenameZWDVW
03-15-2008, 09:03 AM
#50
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: In your garage, swipin' da lug nutz
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Alright, edited the list. Just missing two of the early years.
Don't know if I mentioned it or not, at least in this thread, but 1996 was a transition year. It went from the 3-screw MAF to the 2-screw design sometime that year, along with the change in throttle bodies. Neither sensor is interchangeable with each other.
Don't know if I mentioned it or not, at least in this thread, but 1996 was a transition year. It went from the 3-screw MAF to the 2-screw design sometime that year, along with the change in throttle bodies. Neither sensor is interchangeable with each other.