Bonneville GXP/ Northstar Powered Cars Discuss your Bonneville GXP and/or any other Northstar powered Olds or Cadillac... Including the 3.5L Twin Cam V6 (Short Star ) 4.0L and 4.6L Northstar V8's. Please use General Chat for non-mechanical issues, and Performance and Brainstorming for improvements.

Bonne GXP vs. Chrysler 300C test

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 11, 2005 | 10:15 PM
  #1  
5.3Avalanche's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Posts like a 4 Banger
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
5.3Avalanche is on a distinguished road
Default Bonne GXP vs. Chrysler 300C test

http://www.popularmechanics.com/auto...tml?page=4&c=y
I personally think that there was something wrong with the bonne used in this test. 0-60 in 6.95 is dreadfully slow. Mine runs about 6.4'* with 91 octane. Good test in all though. Shows that the bonne can really dominate in the twisties. So much for that ~mercedes~ chassis.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2005 | 10:17 PM
  #2  
1993 SLE's Avatar
Senior Member
Certified Car Nut
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 19,756
Likes: 1
1993 SLE is on a distinguished road
Default

the 300C can walk the GXP,

it has been verifed with a member that has a SSEI totally stock. and the 300c walked the SSEi the GXP is slower than the SSEi

not a hater of any kind......thought i would throw that in there to be safe
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2005 | 10:50 PM
  #3  
Lowrider0308's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: The South
Lowrider0308 is on a distinguished road
Default

300 C'* dont impress me...I may be partial to Bonne'* though lol
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2005 | 01:25 AM
  #4  
SSsuperchargedEi's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,551
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, Pa.
SSsuperchargedEi is on a distinguished road
Default

bump...


their GXP ran 15.0. lowest i've heard of
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2005 | 03:22 PM
  #5  
fantastic88's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,328
Likes: 1
From: Lakeville, MN
fantastic88 is on a distinguished road
Default

300 C'* dont impress me...
I agree. They may be quick now. But wait for when they hit 100K and that pin that shuts off 4 cylinders for cruising breaks and the engine needs a total rebuild.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2005 | 04:33 PM
  #6  
Jim W's Avatar
Senior Member
Expert Gearhead
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 20,893
Likes: 2
From: Mississauga, Ontario
Jim W is on a distinguished road
Default

Lets hope not considering GM intends to do that will all their lux cars shortly (they gave it a go, but didnt work out to well in prototype cars) but they think they perfected it now.

Northstar powered cars have something similar, yet its used in situations where the engine tries to save itself. Fuel gets cut off to 4 cylinders and its called Limp Home mode.

As for styling, the new 300'* are oh so very "love or hate" cars. I personally hate the new styling. In my book the GXP looks far and away a better car. Had Chrysler dropped the V8 HEMI powered RWD into the 2000-2004 300M, I'd be all over like flies in ****

Oh well.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2005 | 04:35 PM
  #7  
SSsuperchargedEi's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,551
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, Pa.
SSsuperchargedEi is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by Jim W
Lets hope not considering GM intends to do that will all their lux cars shortly (they gave it a go, but didnt work out to well in prototype cars) but they think they perfected it now.

Northstar powered cars have something similar, yet its used in situations where the engine tries to save itself. Fuel gets cut off to 4 cylinders and its called Limp Home mode.

As for styling, the new 300'* are oh so very "love or hate" cars. I personally hate the new styling. In my book the GXP looks far and away a better car. Had Chrysler dropped the V8 HEMI powered RWD into the 2000-2004 300M, I'd be all over like flies in ****

Oh well.
300M'* look too sporty for a V8 in my opinion. Plus the V6 in that car did just fine.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2005 | 04:40 PM
  #8  
Jim W's Avatar
Senior Member
Expert Gearhead
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 20,893
Likes: 2
From: Mississauga, Ontario
Jim W is on a distinguished road
Default

Indeed it did, however when I tested several M Specials (btw wicked car..wow!) it just lacked that extra...umph that I get from the Aurora).

It would be a dangerous car (literally) with an SRT engine though!
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2005 | 12:10 PM
  #9  
bonkjmma's Avatar
Senior Member
Posts like a 4 Banger
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: Motor City(ish)
bonkjmma is on a distinguished road
Default

I just watched a show on Speed the other night that compared the new GTO to a few other cars. One of the comparisons was a 2005 GXP. Their best 1/4 run with the GXP was 14.36 @ ?? mph.... Don't remember the trap speed but I do remember the ET......
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2005 | 12:13 PM
  #10  
SSsuperchargedEi's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,551
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, Pa.
SSsuperchargedEi is on a distinguished road
Default

no way a GXP ran 14.3... that was most likely the gto...
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:01 AM.