Bonneville GXP/ Northstar Powered Cars Discuss your Bonneville GXP and/or any other Northstar powered Olds or Cadillac... Including the 3.5L Twin Cam V6 (Short Star ) 4.0L and 4.6L Northstar V8's. Please use General Chat for non-mechanical issues, and Performance and Brainstorming for improvements.

What grade fuel does the Bonneville GXP run on?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 12, 2005 | 07:38 PM
  #1  
gm4life's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 2
gm4life is on a distinguished road
Default What grade fuel does the Bonneville GXP run on?

Car and Driver had 92 listed in there article but the same Cadillac motor is listed as regular! What gives? Will it run on regular? Or is like 91 or 92 or higher recommended? What do you GXP owners put in yours? Thanks please respond Chris!
Reply
Old May 12, 2005 | 07:44 PM
  #2  
chuckwi11's Avatar
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: Daytona
chuckwi11 is on a distinguished road
Default

I have never put anything other than 93 octane in my GXP. I try to stick to the premuim brands as well... Chevron or if not available Shell or Amoco/BP
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 11:57 AM
  #3  
sahensley's Avatar
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Wood River, IL
sahensley is on a distinguished road
Default Re: What grade fuel does the Bonneville GXP run on?

Originally Posted by gm4life
Car and Driver had 92 listed in there article but the same Cadillac motor is listed as regular! What gives? Will it run on regular? Or is like 91 or 92 or higher recommended? What do you GXP owners put in yours? Thanks please respond Chris!
The owners manual says it will run on all octanes, 87-93, but I have a hard time putting the lowest in mine. I am used to my 95 that needed 92 or better for the supercharger. I have ran regular in the GXP twice and had no problems. I primarily stick to silver(BP Amoco) which is 89 octane, I think.
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 12:10 PM
  #4  
Jim W's Avatar
Senior Member
Expert Gearhead
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 20,893
Likes: 2
From: Mississauga, Ontario
Jim W is on a distinguished road
Default

It all depends on engine compression. Early Northstars had high compression ratios (10.3:1) like in the 4.0, however after 2000, the 4.0 and 4.6 were lowered to a modest 10.1:1 compression so premium wasnt required.

I bet dollars to donuts the GXP 4.6L V8 has 10.1:1 comp therefore low/mid grade gas is acceptable.
Reply
Old May 16, 2005 | 05:01 PM
  #6  
partsmanager's Avatar
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
partsmanager is on a distinguished road
Default

As far as I know, my wife uses 87 octane in ours with no concerns.
Reply
Old May 18, 2005 | 01:44 PM
  #7  
LiquidGXP's Avatar
Junior Member
Posts like a Ricer Type-R
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Northampton, PA
LiquidGXP is on a distinguished road
Default

When I first got my GXP I always put 87 in it but then started thinking about the compression. I know my 98 GTP needed 92-93 if you ever got into the boost but it could deal with 87 in emergency situations. (or if the stupid dealer makes your "free tank of gas" when you take delivery 87 because the dipshit detail kid cant read!) It says clearly on the tank door in big red letters Premium fuel ONLY. The GXP doesnt have this so I always questioned it. I think I'll try a full tank of 93 an see if I notice anything different.. prolly not.
Reply
Old May 18, 2005 | 05:00 PM
  #8  
dialtone76's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
dialtone76 is on a distinguished road
Default

I am not too Savvy, but what is the potential Impact of using 87 vs 93 octane?

I remember that in the Dealer Brochure is said it uses 87 Octane, which was different that other cars in its class. I know 93 can't hurt, but isn't this the age old argument about the benifits of premium gas in engines not designed for it?

I mean in terms of testing for improvements, what should be looked at? MPG? I don't think acceleration improvments, or engine performance overall could be detected just by "feel" when switching octanes. Are there any long term disadvantages to using one or the other?

Any insight would be appreciated.

-Ian
Reply
Old May 18, 2005 | 10:05 PM
  #9  
SSEimatt93's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,135
Likes: 1
From: Lethbridge, Alberta, _______Canada._______ West Coast Bonneville Fest ___05,06,07 Survivor___
SSEimatt93 is on a distinguished road
Default

Personally, If I owned a GXP, aka. expensive car. I would run 91 atleast. Like we've heard before, running lower octane sometimes wont make a difference cost wise, if you have to fill up more frequently with regular.
just my .02
Reply
Old May 18, 2005 | 10:10 PM
  #10  
LakevilleSSEi's Avatar
Senior Member
True Car Nut
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 9,130
Likes: 0
From: Farmington, Minnesota =MWBF '05 SURVIVOR= =CEBF '06 SURVIVOR= =August '06 COTM=
LakevilleSSEi is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by inurok
Actually I thought GM installed knock sensors in the newer Northstars allowing lower octane fuels. Anyway I use 87 as I have noticed no performance increase with 93 octane myslf.
As if they wouldn't?


Anyways....I'd run 93 or better if I could.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:25 AM.