Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning Talk about modifications, or anything else associated with performance enhancements. Have a new idea for performance/reliability? Post it here. No idea is stupid! (please use Detailing and Appearance for cosmetic ideas)

It's time... 2000 Impala LS build up

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-28-2007, 02:18 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
 
petraman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Granville, Ohio ~NEBF '07 Survivor~
Posts: 5,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
petraman is on a distinguished road
Default It'* time... 2000 Impala LS build up

Yes, that'* right. I miss my boost... Now that I have an actual income (haha), I'm planing on building up my Impala. The first thing I'm doing is going with an Intense tranny rebuild, not sure of the options yet. After that, I'd LIKE to do an L67 top end swap, but I guess I'm still up in the air with the other two options (N/A, turbo). I'd like to be around 300 WHP when I'm done, so it'* enough to stand out, but it won't diminish the daily driver aspect. So here'* my list as of now; any opinions would be awesome:
L67 Top Swap (ported as best I can)
FWI
MPS (Probably would start with the 3.2)
Gatorback belt
180 tstat
Yella Terra Roller Rockers
3" Downpipe with O2 simulator and highflow cat
Pacesetter Headers
SLP Exhaust
Stage 2 Heads and Cam down the road

Keep in mind, this won't be overnight. This will probably be a 1-3 year project.

Now, what options do you think I should go with for the tranny rebuild, keeping that in mind?
Old 07-28-2007, 02:41 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
 
McGrath's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Wickliffe, Ohio
Posts: 2,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
McGrath is on a distinguished road
Default

I think you should decide if you are doing a top swap or L67 swap or doing a turbo before you plan a transmission. I don't like the idea of boosting a L36 do to the weaker rods I just don't think it would hold up as something with L67 rods or even better L32 rods would.

But you can always get the FWI & headers before hand since those will be used no which route you choose.
Old 07-28-2007, 03:57 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
 
TJ'sblackbonne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: plattsburgh NY
Posts: 2,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TJ'sblackbonne is on a distinguished road
Default

Well first if you get headers then they will be a waste if you go turbo, so figure that out.

Next i LOL at your comment about a 3.2 pulley. If you are top swapping then sorry but even with those mods a 3.2 is way too small for the high compression L36 bottom. If you want to run a 3.2 you better think a cam and probably atleast a SS IC. Or else i would think maybe a 3.8 or you MIGHT be abkle to get away with a 3.5 with a good tune and stuff.
Old 07-28-2007, 03:57 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
 
TJ'sblackbonne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: plattsburgh NY
Posts: 2,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TJ'sblackbonne is on a distinguished road
Default

Any also if you go headers then you dont need a 3 inch downpipe.

And the SLP exhaust is more for sound then anything. You would be in more better shape spending that money to more mods that will help you FLOW then the exhaust.
Old 07-28-2007, 04:41 PM
  #5  
Member
Posts like a V-Tak
 
oldsrocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
oldsrocket is on a distinguished road
Default

hey mcrgrath

some of the worlds most powerfull 3800s are made with the l36 bottom end

look up ZZ Performance

they will tell you
Old 07-28-2007, 06:20 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
 
McGrath's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Wickliffe, Ohio
Posts: 2,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
McGrath is on a distinguished road
Default

Ha, yeah a tubro and standard headers wouldn't work very well together

Originally Posted by oldsrocket
some of the worlds most powerfull 3800s are made with the l36 bottom end
I'm not debating the amount of power it could make. I'm speaking of reliability, this isn't going to be a track queen we are talking about a street car that won't be torn down and looked over all the time.

Ed
Old 07-28-2007, 07:10 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
 
TJ'sblackbonne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: plattsburgh NY
Posts: 2,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TJ'sblackbonne is on a distinguished road
Default

Originally Posted by jr's3800
A swap seems like a good choice..
cough i agree and take your own advice cough
Old 07-28-2007, 09:07 PM
  #9  
DINOSAURUS BOOSTUS

Expert Gearhead
 
BillBoost37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Enfield, CT
Posts: 41,391
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
BillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of lightBillBoost37 is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Pete...before you decide whether to top swap, turbo or L67 swap. Talk to your local performance guys. I haven't seen them steer anyone wrong yet.

When my lower end checked out.. I made some calls and was talked out of the L36 bottom end for reliability on a DD

As for the rear O2 sim..why? Currently Caspers is dealing with the government on them and it'* an issue. I run a rear O2 with no troubles.
Old 07-28-2007, 11:23 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
Certified GM nut
 
OLDsman105's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OLDsman105 is on a distinguished road
Default

I would talk to intense about a turbo and a built tranny if i was in your postion.


Quick Reply: It's time... 2000 Impala LS build up



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:45 PM.