L27 heads - Rockers on 3/8 bolts
#31
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Lenox, IL
Posts: 2,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I didnt "drill out" the 1.8 rocker arms when I put them on my heads, You want them to be machined so you know that the holes are straight and true, otherwise you could have issues with binding or what have you.
I haven't had any issues with mine in over 5,000 miles of use
I haven't had any issues with mine in over 5,000 miles of use
#32
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Philly
Posts: 4,508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LTFT or BLM depending on what software/scantool you're using is the long-term memory for fuel. It'* compensation for the base fueling algorithm. STFT or INT is the short term memory for fuel and it is direct compensation based on input from the O2 sensor in closed loop. (operating temp and not WOT)
Ideally, the LTFT should be around 128 and be fairly steady. The STFT should hover around 128 but will change more frequently.
If you're running lean, you're STFTs will first try and compensate and the values will be above 128. Next, your LTFTs will raise above 128 so that your STFTs will hover around 128 again. If you're running rich, it'll be the opposite.
You're running the same PCM (I think) and code I'm currently running. (I'm using the 94-95 L27/L67 code) It faster than your average OBD1 pcm and there are a ton of unlocked parameters you can tune. More than anything you would ever really need.
Ideally, the LTFT should be around 128 and be fairly steady. The STFT should hover around 128 but will change more frequently.
If you're running lean, you're STFTs will first try and compensate and the values will be above 128. Next, your LTFTs will raise above 128 so that your STFTs will hover around 128 again. If you're running rich, it'll be the opposite.
You're running the same PCM (I think) and code I'm currently running. (I'm using the 94-95 L27/L67 code) It faster than your average OBD1 pcm and there are a ton of unlocked parameters you can tune. More than anything you would ever really need.
#33
Senior Member
True Car Nut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Lenox, IL
Posts: 2,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LTFT or BLM depending on what software/scantool you're using is the long-term memory for fuel. It'* compensation for the base fueling algorithm. STFT or INT is the short term memory for fuel and it is direct compensation based on input from the O2 sensor in closed loop. (operating temp and not WOT)
Ideally, the LTFT should be around 128 and be fairly steady. The STFT should hover around 128 but will change more frequently.
If you're running lean, you're STFTs will first try and compensate and the values will be above 128. Next, your LTFTs will raise above 128 so that your STFTs will hover around 128 again. If you're running rich, it'll be the opposite.
You're running the same PCM (I think) and code I'm currently running. (I'm using the 94-95 L27/L67 code) It faster than your average OBD1 pcm and there are a ton of unlocked parameters you can tune. More than anything you would ever really need.
Ideally, the LTFT should be around 128 and be fairly steady. The STFT should hover around 128 but will change more frequently.
If you're running lean, you're STFTs will first try and compensate and the values will be above 128. Next, your LTFTs will raise above 128 so that your STFTs will hover around 128 again. If you're running rich, it'll be the opposite.
You're running the same PCM (I think) and code I'm currently running. (I'm using the 94-95 L27/L67 code) It faster than your average OBD1 pcm and there are a ton of unlocked parameters you can tune. More than anything you would ever really need.
#34
sorry didnt see that
as for the reversion you spoke about, is that true for sc engines, I'm sure it would help at light throttle
I thought they only used it in na engines to keep backflow down
as for the reversion you spoke about, is that true for sc engines, I'm sure it would help at light throttle
I thought they only used it in na engines to keep backflow down
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hay Bay Woody
General GM Chat
1
06-21-2010 05:32 PM
xtremerevolution
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
7
06-04-2010 06:52 PM
mAsalicio
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
4
05-28-2007 12:41 PM
Rogue
Performance, Brainstorming & Tuning
14
03-23-2006 05:14 PM